Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It would be wonderful if the theistic view of creation that you reference would be allowed in schools, but it's not. Only the atheistic view of Darwinist creationism is allowed under the guise of science.
One view and one view only. The atheistic Darwinist creationist view.
But does having those unknowns then automatically assume that the theory is true. If it is admitted that there are unknown gaps to fill in to then be completely sure that the ToE is true how can you then say that its true and correct and scientists just need to find the rest of the evidence.
Just don't try to prove it...right?
Of course ToE has been shown to be true on a number of levels. However, I think the most compelling evidence is that of the fossil record. It could not be laid out in such a manner without evolution, that is unless all those fossils just popped into existence at just the right place and time as to describe what we would expect to see in evolution.
Some may try to do that, but most atheists I know, and granted they're few, are good people. But, that doesn't dismiss the fact there is an atheist agenda to promote their creationist, an only their creationist, viewpoint in schools.
Of course ToE has been shown to be true on a number of levels. However, I think the most compelling evidence is that of the fossil record. It could not be laid out in such a manner without evolution, that is unless all those fossils just popped into existence at just the right place and time as to describe what we would expect to see in evolution.
Of course ToE has been shown to be true on a number of levels. However, I think the most compelling evidence is that of the fossil record. It could not be laid out in such a manner without evolution, that is unless all those fossils just popped into existence at just the right place and time as to describe what we would expect to see in evolution.
What? Are you getting frustrated because you keep using the wrong terminology?
The evidence that supports evolution is scientific evidence, it is objective evidence, it is empirical evidence. Do you disagree with me on any of these facts?
What do you mean by just popping into existence at just the right place?
Ridiculous. Evolution could accommodate all sorts of different fossil sequences. For just one example, instead of the current reptile-to-mammal story, mammals could have been said to have evolved from amphibians. And some leading evolutionists actually used to promote this.
After reading so many similar comments as yours,RickG, I have come to the conclusion that most evolutionists on here do not understand their own theory enough to be able to competently identify evidence in its favor.
I am not sure. Some are and some aren't. The same for the more extreme theists who insist that their interpretation of the Bible is the only correct one.I would assume that for the most part on this forum that it is the anti-theist that posts the most frequently and who are most vocal about the ToE being devoid of God?
There is no reptile-to-mammal story. If you know anything about the theory, you would know that. The origin of species is a tree, not a ladder.
Yet another evolutionist who doesn't appear to understand his own theory.
"Primitive synapsids are usually called pelycosaurs; more advanced mammal-like ones, therapsids. The non-mammalian members are described as mammal-like reptiles in classical systematics. (Carrol, Benton)"
Synapsid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Strange, you quoted the definition in your post, yet you still got it wrong. Did you miss that it was the definition of Darwinist creationism?
Darwinist creationism:
The belief that living organisms originate from the specific act of divine creation which was the ensuring that all species of organisms arise and develop through natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individuals ability to compete, survive and reproduce.
It's a little bigger...did that help?
Bigger, smaller, it doesn't change a thing. You're promoting the theistic view of Darwinism. Unfortunately, only the atheistic view of Darwinist creationism is allowed in schools.
Why is that, do you think?
Bigger, smaller, it doesn't change a thing. You're promoting the theistic view of Darwinism. Unfortunately, only the atheistic view of Darwinist creationism is allowed in schools.
Why is that, do you think?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?