Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I will ask you again, would you accept any evidence he provided or would you dismiss it as not being evidence?
Not for him because he thinks he's is always being fair to everyone, as far as he is concerned creationists never tell lies.
We know creationists tell lies because creationism only exists because creationists tell lies, creationists can't see the lies because they do not want to see the lies.
The issue is someone claiming they have 'mountains of evidence' and then not posting it. They're seemingly afraid to have their 'mountains of evidence' critically examined.
No, the issue is people posting mountains of evidence and idiots thinking that nothing but the bible counts as evidence.
I would examine any evidence he provided, which has been absolutely none so far. How can I know if I'll accept it unless he posts it? That's apparently not going to happen though.
Anyone can make the baseless claim that they have 'mountains of evidence' for their position, but without presenting it for all to read and examine it's meaningless.
How about you present evidence for your position so we can get an idea of what you consider evidence
I've said repeatedly my position is a faith based position with the bible as a guideline. I've said repeatedly that the complexity and variety of life is best explained by a creator instead of a random, meaningless, mindless, purposeless (other than procreation) and directionless mechanism acting on a single life form from long long ago.
How about the guy actually posting the 'mountains of evidence' he claims he has and let the examination of his evidence begin? The truth is this, it's very likely his 'evidence' is just more of the guesses and suppositions, the maybe's, the could be's, ect. of atheistic creationism. In other words, it's also a faith-based view of creation.
I've said repeatedly my position is a faith based position with the bible as a guideline. I've said repeatedly that the complexity and variety of life is best explained by a creator instead of a random, meaningless, mindless, purposeless (other than procreation) and directionless mechanism acting on a single life form from long long ago.
How about the guy actually posting the 'mountains of evidence' he claims he has and let the examination of his evidence begin? The truth is this, it's very likely his 'evidence' is just more of the guesses and suppositions, the maybe's, the could be's, ect. of atheistic creationism. In other words, it's also a faith-based view of creation.
What is your evidence that a creator is a better explanation?
Well then, how about explaining the fossil record without evolution. How did all those fossils get into the strata they are located at just the right time and place?
Nope, not going to get sidetracked on the creationist question here. Your attempt to divert is a common one, but stick with creationism, i.e, the various views of how/who created humanity.
It's my subjective opinion, as it's the subjective opinion of Darwinist creationists that all of life was created only by naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago.
In other words, you can't explain the fossil record without evolution. You are asking for evidence of evolution and I am asking for evidence that shows no evolution with reference to the fossil record.
Your opinion doesn't matter in the context of these conversations
I've probably asked over a 100 times now for evidence that all life to be entirely, without any other impetus, the complete and total result of natural mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago.
Neither does your opinion matter and neither does the opinion of any Darwinist creationist matter in the context of these conversations.
Everybody has opinions.
Because, what you are asking for is all of the evidence, which nobody has the time to copy and paste to a web forum. All the evidence ever found, only shows natural processes being responsible for everything, in every field of science, not just biology. Nobody is going to post the entirety of humanity's current knowledge of the universe on christianforums.com because that would take literally forever, since it is logically impossible.
You want evidence? Start using your five senses.
You're making the claim that something other than natural is involved, so the onus is on you to show the evidence for it. Until then, stop lying.
Again, calling evolution "creationism". Again, you expose your position as a lie.
No, the burden of proof is on those who claim that the creationist view that all of life is the result of only, totally, solely naturalistic processes acting on a single life form from long long ago.
Because you made it up. It is a straw man.No evidence at all has been provided for such a creationist viewpoint.
Which is not a claim anyone is making. That claim is your own invention, and I'm not the only person to explain that to you.
Because you made it up. It is a straw man.
Particularly, the "only, totally, solely" part.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?