Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And that the land and vegetation preceded the sun and stars...
Most, if not all, plants do not mate. They reporduce through their seeds or through bulbs.
Are all pastors Con men? You are now showing your anti-Christiasn bias. Christisn are not againts real science.
If it annoying to you, straighten us all out or ignore us.
'Kind' is as well defined as 'species.'" You just don like to considier them the same thing. If you use 'kind' you have to consider how the Bible uses it and that might put a kink in your evolutinary chain of evolution.
Let me clear it up for you. Evolution teaches that all life forms originated from a single source and over the years has evolved into the great variety we have today. Is that accurate or not?
Of course they have no idea how that life form originated or what it was or what it evolved into. You have no idea what the second, third, fourth, into infinity was. You start with an unscientific guess and have been guessing ever since.
It is only a strawman to you becaue you disagree with it an cannot refute it.
If I didn't respone to it it is because I have not seen it. I find it difficult in this forum to find some messages. If I ever find it, I will respond.
If somethign is a FACT, it is true. It is somethign that has been proven.
Not that is just plain silly. Childlren do not always get the same blood type as their parents . If the doctor does not know what type you parents have, they must test yours to prove what kind you need so you will not die.
A fact is not a description of an observed event. A fact is what the observation reveals to make it a fact.
The FACT is that science had proved there is more than one blood type.
You have shot yourself in the head when you say "there is no such thing as a false fact," then say nothing in science has been proven. That is contradictory.
Some thing is proven when it can be repeated and observed.
Science has developed a machine that can prove what your blood type is and it will come out the same every time.
It doesn matter if you can predict it. If it is a fact and you have admditted there are not false facts, it has already been proven and that is a FACT.
All you are doing is digging your hole deeper. You can guess wha tthe blood type might be, but you can also prove what it is. You say we KNOW. If we KNOW, then it has been proven. If it hasn't been proven, you can't know
I just can't understand how anyone with a 3 diget IQ can claim science has not prove there is more than one blood type or that DNA does exist.
You need to tell ther Noble prize folks to stop given the science prize for guessing.
That always happens when you can't offer the scientific evidence for your dogma.
That makes no sense.You do unless you can prove it is just a story. Can you do that?
That makes no sense.
That's like saying it's a fact that Santa Claus exists unless someone can prove otherwise.
Most, if not all, plants do not mate.
This is completely and utterly wrong.
I'm not being rude here, so please don't take it as such, but you obviously lack even the most rudimentary knowledge of biology.
So how can you possibly make any claim about evolution when you clearly don't understand the first thing about it? Wouldn't it make more sense to learn at least the rudiments of science, and especially biology, before coming to any conclusion?
If you don't, you are letting someone else control what you think. That is a bad thing.
That makes no sense.
That's like saying it's a fact that Santa Claus exists unless someone can prove otherwise.
Oh, I see. Like Darwinian evolution theory.
Really, why do people bring up Santa Claus? Everyone knows that the idea was based on a real person and that the rest was made up for children for a holiday. Comparing that to real, eyewitness historical testimony is just either poor thinking or trying to make an excuse for unbelief.
Okay if we think for ourselves?AFAIK most biblical scholars agree there are no eyewitness accounts of Jesus. If I'm wrong here, could you please point me to an eyewitness of account of Jesus verified by most reputable biblical scholars. Thanks in advance.
Of course, you are free to believe whatever you want, no matter how ludicrous.Okay if we think for ourselves?
Of course, you are free to believe whatever you want, no matter how ludicrous.
But why would you believe something if there is no evidence or proof?
Do you also believe in Santa, Allah, the Easter Bunny, or Zeus? Why or why not?
Of course, you are free to believe whatever you want, no matter how ludicrous.
But why would you believe something if there is no evidence or proof?
Do you also believe in Santa, Allah, the Easter Bunny, or Zeus? Why or why not?
That's just cute on ten different levels.Of course, you are free to believe whatever you want, no matter how ludicrous.
We call it faith.But why would you believe something if there is no evidence or proof?
All the above, with the exception of the Easter Bunny.Do you also believe in Santa, Allah, the Easter Bunny, or Zeus? Why or why not?
That's not his name though, is it?I think you really mean; Ok if we choose to believe what we want to believe? And I would say, absolutely.
That's right.They just aren't reasons others feel have any logic or evidence to back it up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?