Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Actually, the bible never explicitly states that the serpent is satan or any other demon. That is something the church endorses though.
Don't argue like a little girl.
You obviously have no idea what you are talking about Fred. Your knowledge and logic about the Bible makes no sense.
And first and foremost don't tell me that I make things up. Just because you don't understand the Bible or the Christian faith, doesn't mean any of it doesn't exist or isn't true.
Why don't you do the excercise I posted above before you keep talking nonsense? We have to start with the basics before we can understand the complicated questions.
If you had just a little knowledge about this book, you would know that is not even logically possible, doesn't make any sense, it would just be a disaster.
If you had a little knowledge about the qualities of God and Satan you could see that it isn't possible for satan to even begin writing what is in the Bible.
That's the reason for the excercise above.
And how are you familiar with the properties of God and Satan? The bible, right?
It's not possible for Satan to begin writing the bible according to whom or what?
If so, there is base to do any argument. (Either definition 1 or definition 2 but not both.)
In this case, your argument does not hold either. There will be no such thing who is omnipotent, and can not do (*).
Contradiction at definition level makes the whole argument invalid.
If you had just a little knowledge about this book, you would know that is not even logically possible, doesn't make any sense, it would just be a disaster.
If you had a little knowledge about the qualities of God and Satan you could see that it isn't possible for satan to even begin writing what is in the Bible.
That's the reason for the excercise above.
I've often wondered - If the Devil is "The Deceiver" and as I've so often heard "God is evident in his creation"...
How are we to know that the Devil didn't write the Bible by whispering in the ears of the inspired?
With this in mind, would it not make more sense to believe in what the Nature of God's creation tells us?
Just a question that often strikes me when people so vehemently defend the literal word.
The problem isn't the Bible, but man's translation of it into other languages, and in that process interpreting meanings to words based upon their own personal beliefs. Jut because the original in the original languages was inspired by God, does not mean that translators were likewise inspired by God.
Bad news for you, then, since we don't have ANY of the originals.
That is my point! There IS NO such thing as something who is both omnipotent AND CANNOT DO *.
THAT is where the logical contradiction is.
Just like, there can be nobody born in both 1950 and 1970.
You can't just assume two contradictory definitions, and ignore that they contradict. That's the whole point of logic exercises; to point out that which contradicts.
Your definitions contradict. They are illogical.
So the conclusion is that there is no God, but not a God who lied, or can lie.
This is not an useful conclusion.
So the conclusion is that there is no God, but not a God who lied, or can lie.
This is not an useful conclusion.
Of course, there is a much better way to define God, which gives the properties of the Christian God and is logically perfect. That is one of the real beauty of Christianity.
Or the Christian God is a vicious, jealous, temperamental killer who loves the smell of burning blood.Of course, there is a much better way to define God, which gives the properties of the Christian God and is logically perfect. That is one of the real beauty of Christianity.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?