Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
A Morality Experiment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ygrene Imref" data-source="post: 70995133" data-attributes="member: 395531"><p>I did name the persons, specifically. </p><p></p><p>And, forget about procreation: I still stand by my choices. The older mom with diabetes has the experience, knowledge base and patience to deal with five kids without killing them; he skills are valuable for both civilization and TEOTWAWKI.</p><p></p><p>The prostitute turned nurse also has valuable life experience. She changed her life and made a career out of something that saves lives instead of destroying them. That is invaluable in a civilization, and in TEOTWAWKI.</p><p></p><p>The young 16 year old "scholastic troublemaker" is young, and unchallenged by LIFE. That is the type of person I would run to save: someone with potential that can be turned into activity with the correct challenges. Whether in civilizatikn, or in TEOTWAWKI, this human is a valuable asset.</p><p></p><p>Now, it just so happens that all three of these people are connected by circumstance that they can see as related. The troublemaker can be mentored, or advised by the prostitute turned nurse. The mother can be a help for the nurse. The young man can give outside insight into adolescence, and what to look for in terms of maximizing the best of a person. </p><p></p><p>But, let's assume these three will never meet. I still stand by my decision. </p><p></p><p>It has to do with the substance of the human, rather than commoditizing their gifts, or what they have to offer the world. That is my philosophy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ygrene Imref, post: 70995133, member: 395531"] I did name the persons, specifically. And, forget about procreation: I still stand by my choices. The older mom with diabetes has the experience, knowledge base and patience to deal with five kids without killing them; he skills are valuable for both civilization and TEOTWAWKI. The prostitute turned nurse also has valuable life experience. She changed her life and made a career out of something that saves lives instead of destroying them. That is invaluable in a civilization, and in TEOTWAWKI. The young 16 year old "scholastic troublemaker" is young, and unchallenged by LIFE. That is the type of person I would run to save: someone with potential that can be turned into activity with the correct challenges. Whether in civilizatikn, or in TEOTWAWKI, this human is a valuable asset. Now, it just so happens that all three of these people are connected by circumstance that they can see as related. The troublemaker can be mentored, or advised by the prostitute turned nurse. The mother can be a help for the nurse. The young man can give outside insight into adolescence, and what to look for in terms of maximizing the best of a person. But, let's assume these three will never meet. I still stand by my decision. It has to do with the substance of the human, rather than commoditizing their gifts, or what they have to offer the world. That is my philosophy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
A Morality Experiment
Top
Bottom