A little more evolutionary logic, the kernel of approaching it maturely

[Gottservant]

Hi there,

So I was wondering how I might better utilize the activation of renewed Evolution.

What I came up with, was the question: what happens to Evolution if you age more slowly?

The logic is this: if your evolution ages more slowly, there is greater pressure on your instinct to be wise, greater pressure on your instinct to be wise, increases the fitness of that instinct, the fitness of that instinct simultaneously increases your survival and your attractiveness, attractiveness and survival being selected for together means that normal standards of appraisal - that is of "Evolutional acuity" - are not engaged, hence the selection for "Evolution" is not actually selected by Evolution (and Evolution wears off).

In other words, the subtext of Evolution is "Evolution is the way to create, if you do it in a hurry!"

This does not fundamentally change the fact, that a fool (a great fool - sic) may still believe it - sorry.

 

[Anthony2019]

I'm not sure if that logic works entirely. Perhaps the best example of evolution is that of the domestic dog from its ancestors where so many breeds have been created in such a relatively short space of time. Arguably, the wolf is smarter, has a more developed social hierarchy, and intelligence to solve problems. I don't think time comes into play here (although it may partly) but more to do with the conditions and environment in which the species live.

 

[The Barbarian]

Hi there,

So I was wondering how I might better utilize the activation of renewed Evolution.

What I came up with, was the question: what happens to Evolution if you age more slowly?

Not very much.

The logic is this: if your evolution ages more slowly, there is greater pressure on your instinct to be wise, greater pressure on your instinct to be wise, increases the fitness of that instinct, the fitness of that instinct simultaneously increases your survival and your attractiveness, attractiveness and survival being selected for together means that normal standards of appraisal - that is of "Evolutional acuity" - are not engaged, hence the selection for "Evolution" is not actually selected by Evolution (and Evolution wears off).

I don't think you've given this very much thought. Natural selection works because those with favorable traits tend to live long enough to reproduce. Once that's happened, how one ages, isn't relevant.

In other words, the subtext of Evolution is "Evolution is the way to create, if you do it in a hurry!"

Nope. See above.

This does not fundamentally change the fact, that a fool (a great fool - sic) may still believe it - sorry

As Everette Dirkson once said, "people are down on things they aren't up on."