Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
A finely tuned universe that points to a God.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimFit" data-source="post: 66491434" data-attributes="member: 308474"><p>Physical Necessity?</p><p>This alternative seems extraordinarily implausible because the constants and quantities are independent of the laws of nature. The laws of nature are consistent with a wide range of values for these constants and quantities. For example, the most promising candidate for a Theory of Everything (T.O.E.) to date, super-string theory or M-Theory, allows a &#8220;cosmic landscape&#8221; of around 10500 different universes governed by the present laws of nature, so that it does nothing to render the observed values of the constants and quantities physically necessary.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It proves INTENTION! Intention exists only in conscious beings.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>God is a Creator, this is the description of God in EVERY religion, therefor this argument goes to garbage. If the Indians describe the properties of the electron the same as we do and call it Electran instead of Electron it means that there is a different electron? Of course not! God is one because He is Infinite, you can't use plural on something infinite, don't you understand that it is stupid? </p><p></p><p>Please change your name to IDontThinkForMyself...because you obsviously use the illogical paradoxes of other atheists.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimFit, post: 66491434, member: 308474"] Physical Necessity? This alternative seems extraordinarily implausible because the constants and quantities are independent of the laws of nature. The laws of nature are consistent with a wide range of values for these constants and quantities. For example, the most promising candidate for a Theory of Everything (T.O.E.) to date, super-string theory or M-Theory, allows a “cosmic landscape” of around 10500 different universes governed by the present laws of nature, so that it does nothing to render the observed values of the constants and quantities physically necessary. It proves INTENTION! Intention exists only in conscious beings. God is a Creator, this is the description of God in EVERY religion, therefor this argument goes to garbage. If the Indians describe the properties of the electron the same as we do and call it Electran instead of Electron it means that there is a different electron? Of course not! God is one because He is Infinite, you can't use plural on something infinite, don't you understand that it is stupid? Please change your name to IDontThinkForMyself...because you obsviously use the illogical paradoxes of other atheists. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
A finely tuned universe that points to a God.
Top
Bottom