Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
A finely tuned universe that points to a God.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Usus Vox Tractus" data-source="post: 66482874" data-attributes="member: 356379"><p>Well....thanks! </p><p></p><p>So is current dark energy and dark matter estimates by cutting edge science not admissible? What about the Standard Model and modern understanding of particle generation which finds 3 stable atomic density levels, excluding 4rth and higher densities with a surety of Sigma 5.3?</p><p></p><p>Is any of that considerable? I can tell you exactly why there are only 3 density levels of matter and antimatter and why we are made of the lightest type of matter charge orientation. I can fully and and unequivocally account for appearent matter/anti-matter asymmetry.</p><p></p><p>I have arrived at modern sciences DE expansive constant to within .3% with my means and it fully explains the rapid early inflation of the universe and later slow plateau we enjoy today.</p><p></p><p>But because I don't have a framed piece of paper on my wall that lets you know you can appeal to my authority, then my soundly logical and extremely accurately predictive model is inconsiderable? Hah!</p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you know why a "childlike" (read beginners Zen mind) is so important? Because it can consider a thing on it's own merits without interference from both self preconceived notions but most importantly, beyond the paradigms the world has authorized for your consumption and repetition. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Scientific theories and paradigms are not necessarily "dis-proven", they are replaced by simpler, more elegant models that more accurately account for universal phenomenon. Like the one I am sharing with you.</p><p></p><p>Which hilariously enough is a very old and well known idea throughout ancient science, ancient religion and ancient philosophy. It's only the now old materialist "science" paradigm that keeps trying to pull something out of nothing or compress everything into a single finite point and failing miserably. Because the fundamental "big bang" premiss is incorrect.</p><p></p><p>"The beginning is the must important part of the work." Plato.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Usus Vox Tractus, post: 66482874, member: 356379"] Well....thanks! So is current dark energy and dark matter estimates by cutting edge science not admissible? What about the Standard Model and modern understanding of particle generation which finds 3 stable atomic density levels, excluding 4rth and higher densities with a surety of Sigma 5.3? Is any of that considerable? I can tell you exactly why there are only 3 density levels of matter and antimatter and why we are made of the lightest type of matter charge orientation. I can fully and and unequivocally account for appearent matter/anti-matter asymmetry. I have arrived at modern sciences DE expansive constant to within .3% with my means and it fully explains the rapid early inflation of the universe and later slow plateau we enjoy today. But because I don't have a framed piece of paper on my wall that lets you know you can appeal to my authority, then my soundly logical and extremely accurately predictive model is inconsiderable? Hah! Do you know why a "childlike" (read beginners Zen mind) is so important? Because it can consider a thing on it's own merits without interference from both self preconceived notions but most importantly, beyond the paradigms the world has authorized for your consumption and repetition. Scientific theories and paradigms are not necessarily "dis-proven", they are replaced by simpler, more elegant models that more accurately account for universal phenomenon. Like the one I am sharing with you. Which hilariously enough is a very old and well known idea throughout ancient science, ancient religion and ancient philosophy. It's only the now old materialist "science" paradigm that keeps trying to pull something out of nothing or compress everything into a single finite point and failing miserably. Because the fundamental "big bang" premiss is incorrect. "The beginning is the must important part of the work." Plato. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
A finely tuned universe that points to a God.
Top
Bottom