Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
a creationist mindset
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Christian Soldier" data-source="post: 294114" data-attributes="member: 3759"><p>"What a remarkable coinkydink.</p><p>Over at <a href="http://www.creationists.org/quote003.html," target="_blank">http://www.creationists.org/quote003.html,</a> where the "evolutionists quote of the month" is located, there is the exact same quote from Gould. Does this mean you never actually read the whole essay. I bet you never even actally had access to the whole essay."</p><p></p><p><strong>Your link is dead, so I went to the site via my browser address block. You're wrong, as is frequently the case. The "quote of the month" over there is from Richard Dawkins, not Gould:</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><a href="http://www.creationists.org/quote005.html" target="_blank">Proof Late_Cretaceous Is Dead Wrong</a> </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>As is the case with virtually all evolutionists, you prove yourself to be highly presumptuous. I didn't get the quote from the site you mention. It isn't the quote of the month as you falsely reported. It may have been there at another time, but you would know that better than me---since I don't frequent that site.</strong></p><p></p><p>"A classic case of out of context quotes."</p><p></p><p><strong>Your unproven opinion only.</strong></p><p></p><p>"By another coincidence, I have been reading Gould's "Dinosaur in a Haystack" and read that very essay just the other day. Funny thing is, when you read the whole essay you get the distinct impression that Gould is not criticizing evolutionists, but rather arguing for a more human face to be put on science and scientists - who are often viewed as automotons.</p><p></p><p>At least that is my opinion. But then again, I actually read the essay - I am not just pretending I did." </p><p></p><p><strong>For someone who has allegedly read the essay, you don't sound too sure of yourself. Phrases like "you get the distinct impression" and "At least that is my opinion" do nothing to prove your specious case. If you really thought the essay proved your point, you would have quoted it at length. Your failure to do so strongly suggests that the quote I provided is in context.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>The evos on this forum have yet to prove my quote is out of context.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Christian Soldier, post: 294114, member: 3759"] "What a remarkable coinkydink. Over at [url]http://www.creationists.org/quote003.html,[/url] where the "evolutionists quote of the month" is located, there is the exact same quote from Gould. Does this mean you never actually read the whole essay. I bet you never even actally had access to the whole essay." [b]Your link is dead, so I went to the site via my browser address block. You're wrong, as is frequently the case. The "quote of the month" over there is from Richard Dawkins, not Gould: [URL=http://www.creationists.org/quote005.html]Proof Late_Cretaceous Is Dead Wrong[/URL] As is the case with virtually all evolutionists, you prove yourself to be highly presumptuous. I didn't get the quote from the site you mention. It isn't the quote of the month as you falsely reported. It may have been there at another time, but you would know that better than me---since I don't frequent that site.[/b] "A classic case of out of context quotes." [b]Your unproven opinion only.[/b] "By another coincidence, I have been reading Gould's "Dinosaur in a Haystack" and read that very essay just the other day. Funny thing is, when you read the whole essay you get the distinct impression that Gould is not criticizing evolutionists, but rather arguing for a more human face to be put on science and scientists - who are often viewed as automotons. At least that is my opinion. But then again, I actually read the essay - I am not just pretending I did." [b]For someone who has allegedly read the essay, you don't sound too sure of yourself. Phrases like "you get the distinct impression" and "At least that is my opinion" do nothing to prove your specious case. If you really thought the essay proved your point, you would have quoted it at length. Your failure to do so strongly suggests that the quote I provided is in context. The evos on this forum have yet to prove my quote is out of context.[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
a creationist mindset
Top
Bottom