Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
a creationist mindset
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Christian Soldier" data-source="post: 293305" data-attributes="member: 3759"><p>"Did Stephen Jay Gould mention, in "In The Mind of the Beholder", whether science was any good at all? Did he mention whether there was a method that led to good results, or was this his announcement that he was retiring from science because the methodology was so non-robotic?"</p><p></p><p><strong>Why would Gould be spinning in his grave over something he said and meant, in an evolutionist periodical? He was merely being honest, which is unusual for an evolutionist. He simply admitted the hard fact that evolutionists who hide behind a veneer of always being "fully rational", "objective" and "logical"---are clearly engaging in "self-serving mythology".</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Kudos to the man for telling the truth. If only Jerry was so honest!</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Christian Soldier, post: 293305, member: 3759"] "Did Stephen Jay Gould mention, in "In The Mind of the Beholder", whether science was any good at all? Did he mention whether there was a method that led to good results, or was this his announcement that he was retiring from science because the methodology was so non-robotic?" [b]Why would Gould be spinning in his grave over something he said and meant, in an evolutionist periodical? He was merely being honest, which is unusual for an evolutionist. He simply admitted the hard fact that evolutionists who hide behind a veneer of always being "fully rational", "objective" and "logical"---are clearly engaging in "self-serving mythology". Kudos to the man for telling the truth. If only Jerry was so honest![/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
a creationist mindset
Top
Bottom