• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

a continuation on the will of man and tongues

Status
Not open for further replies.

SnuP

A son of the Most High
Jul 22, 2002
1,060
9
49
Florida
Visit site
✟24,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
on the basis that God led me to repentence of my own selfish will.

As you have said that the will of man is wicked.  Which drew me deeper into His presece and that any act outside of His will removed me from His presence.

Only God leads you away from your own selfish will, and it was the same leading that drew me to speaking in tongues.
 
Upvote 0

SnuP

A son of the Most High
Jul 22, 2002
1,060
9
49
Florida
Visit site
✟24,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Second, after repenting, as I am drawn deeper in to the presence of God, tongues spontaneously comes up out of my being.  I will be singing and without relising it I will have transitioned.   Its so natural a thing that to say that it is not the will of God would be foolish.  If I do not repent of my own will then I can never reach the deeper places in His presence. 
 
Upvote 0

sola fide

neo-Puritan
Aug 2, 2002
323
7
44
✟660.00
Faith
Calvinist
But the statement you made earlier said that man repents out of his own will? How are you now saying that God "lead you" to repent? It's either ALL the will of God or it's NONE the will of God. I believe you need to make a clearer stance on this.
I do believe that only God can lead to repentance...but you clearly stated in the other thread that it was man's free will...I believe you've flip flopped a bit, just my opinion.
By the way, repentance does not mean you are suddenly perfect, and in the immediate presence of God, it means you have "changed your mind" and are forgiven of your transgressions, not that you are suddenly perfect and able to do new amazing things you were once not capable of....it means you have a fresh start....once again, my opinion, albeit scripturally based.
 
Upvote 0

SnuP

A son of the Most High
Jul 22, 2002
1,060
9
49
Florida
Visit site
✟24,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Maybe you didn't get one of my earlier post.

God leads me to repentence, and then I adopt His will, I follow His will, I make His will my own, doing His will becomes my will, my will changes to do His will.  Therfore I have a new will, but it is still my will (that I do His will).

There is no flip floping.

That's correct, I have a changed mind, not perfect, just able to handle more of God.

I never said that repentence made me perfect, or that it gave me "extra powers".
 
Upvote 0

sola fide

neo-Puritan
Aug 2, 2002
323
7
44
✟660.00
Faith
Calvinist
I'm going to end my discussion for the night with this post. After I received Christ I became a member of a charismatic church. The things you claim in your posts happen there all the time. I have this same exact debate every couple of weeks with a charismatic buddy of mine.
I've laid hands on the sick, had hands laid on me, had tongues spoken over me, everything else in the book. The only conclusion I could come to from those experiences are as follows...Even when I have had a purely repentant heart, I never understood a word another person was speaking (when they were speaking in tongues), and every time I had a hand laid on me at that church, the person was usually trying to knock me down.
I drew far much more confusion from that church than edification.
I have come to the conclusion that sola scriptura is the essential doctrine. Experiences should be based on scripture and not the other way around.
The experiences I had in charismatich churches were definitely not scriptural, nor are the ones I see on television daily. I definitely believe that scripture is sufficient and that these Biblical gifts that you suppose are in a dispensation, just as they were in the post-testament times. I am glad that you are striving for knowledge of our Lord, Jesus Christ...but my hope is that you will seek out the doctrine of sola scriptura and study its relevance for today....I recommend that you pick up the book "charismatic chaos" by John McArther if you haven't read it.
Believe me I've enough about the faith movement...just give it a try it'll be worth the read...if you don't agree with it, it'll give you something else to debate about.

Soli Deo gloria!
 
Upvote 0

SnuP

A son of the Most High
Jul 22, 2002
1,060
9
49
Florida
Visit site
✟24,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I have had experiences where God told me that he loved me, where he promised me my wife, where He told me to stay in my word.  where He healed me, both physically and/or imotionally.  But most of my experiences were of conviction or Him drawing me to repentence.  The experiences out of my "charismatic " church have always yeilded good fruit, greatest of which is being set free from darkness in my life, which has yielded much happiness and love.

I'm sorry to here that your experience was so disturbing.  A lot of "charismatic" churches have a lot of error in them and even darkness and witchcraft.  But that is not all of them.

God Bless,

Untill our next discussion, may the peace of God be with you.

SnuP
 
Upvote 0

Thunderchild

Sheep in Wolf's clothing
Jan 5, 2002
1,542
1
69
Adelaide
Visit site
✟3,180.00
Faith
Non-Denom
But the statement you made earlier said that man repents out of his own will? How are you now saying that God "lead you" to repent? It's either ALL the will of God or it's NONE the will of God. I believe you need to make a clearer stance on this.

Never heard the saying - "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." The same condition applies here.
 
Upvote 0

Thunderchild

Sheep in Wolf's clothing
Jan 5, 2002
1,542
1
69
Adelaide
Visit site
✟3,180.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Even when I have had a purely repentant heart, I never understood a word another person was speaking (when they were speaking in tongues), and every time I had a hand laid on me at that church, the person was usually trying to knock me down.
I drew far much more confusion from that church than edification.

Ah yes. .... the Charismatics can be very good at ALL of that. The only church I ever was under orders to prophesy to was a Charismatic Church. The message wasn't pleasant - nor was the response of the Church Leadership.

Nonetheless, 35 people out of the 400 then present decided to repent and go look for a church which showed some signs of obedience to God. Those 35 included one man who had been committing adultery (and whose daughter declared less than a week earlier - "if it is good enough for you, it is good enough for me,") and his wife.
 
Upvote 0

SpiritPsalmist

Heavy lean toward Messianic
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2002
21,696
1,466
71
Southeast Kansas
✟416,924.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by sola fide
I'm going to end my discussion for the night with this post. After I received Christ I became a member of a charismatic church. The things you claim in your posts happen there all the time. I have this same exact debate every couple of weeks with a charismatic buddy of mine.
I've laid hands on the sick, had hands laid on me, had tongues spoken over me, everything else in the book. The only conclusion I could come to from those experiences are as follows...Even when I have had a purely repentant heart, I never understood a word another person was speaking (when they were speaking in tongues), and every time I had a hand laid on me at that church, the person was usually trying to knock me down.
I drew far much more confusion from that church than edification.
I have come to the conclusion that sola scriptura is the essential doctrine. Experiences should be based on scripture and not the other way around.
The experiences I had in charismatich churches were definitely not scriptural, nor are the ones I see on television daily. I definitely believe that scripture is sufficient and that these Biblical gifts that you suppose are in a dispensation, just as they were in the post-testament times. I am glad that you are striving for knowledge of our Lord, Jesus Christ...but my hope is that you will seek out the doctrine of sola scriptura and study its relevance for today....I recommend that you pick up the book "charismatic chaos" by John McArther if you haven't read it.
Believe me I've enough about the faith movement...just give it a try it'll be worth the read...if you don't agree with it, it'll give you something else to debate about.

Soli Deo gloria!

 

sola fide,

I can only apologize for the experience that you had at a charasmatic church.  Someone should have been more responsible for explaining to you what was happening.  Unfortionately, most of them probably did not understand it either, but just did what they've seen others do.

Anyway, in 1 Cor 14:2 (and forgive me if some have already gone over this with you. I've not been able to read all posts) we are told (Amplified Bible) "For one who speaks in an unknown tongue speaks not to men but to God, for no one understands or catches his meaning, because in the Holy Spirit he utters secret truths and hidden things not obvious to the understanding."

In verse 26-28 "What then, brethren, is the right course? When you meet together, each one has a hymn, a teaching, a disclosure of special knowledge or information, an utterance in a strange tongue, or an interpretation of it. But let everything be constructive and edifying and for the good of all.  If some speak in a strange tongue, let the number be limited to two or at the most three, and each one taking his turn, and let one interpret and explain what is said. But if there is no one to do the interpreting, let each of them keep still in church and talk to himself and to God."

Basically, there are two types of unknown tongues.  One, where the "tongue talker" is talking expressly to God.  There is no need for an intrepretation because it is a private conversation between them and God.  In a church setting, where everyone is praying in tongues together, it is not necessary for you to understand what your neighbor is saying.

The second is the "message from Holy Spirit".  This is generally one that resounds above the others and all others stop talking to listen.  There is always to be an intrepretation.  If not, the person was out of order, and should refrain from future "messages" until possibly they themselves are able either to give the message without the tongue (commonly referred to as prophesy) or may intrepret it themselves.

This is a gift I am quite fluid in, so hopefully I have helped answer any questions you have.  I'm not saying I'm perfect, it just is that I flow well in both, tongues and intrepretation.

I'm not sure what repentance has to do with it but if Jesus is in your heart then you have the Holy Spirit.  Anyone that is saved may be "baptized" in the Holy Sprit and speak in tongues.  1 Cor 14:4 says "He who speaks in a strange tongue edifies and improves himself".  It's for your edification brother, not for you to be confused. 
Be blessed!
 
Upvote 0

Andrew

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2002
4,974
24
✟21,360.00
Faith
Non-Denom
quote:"I definitely believe that scripture is sufficient ... but my hope is that you will seek out the doctrine of sola scriptura "

Just relying scripture alone is one-half of the picture. The Word and the Spirit always go hand in hand. One cannot be over Spirited and under-Worded (you become flaky) nor can one be over-Worded and under-Spirited (eg cessationist).

A spiritual truth that lies in the book of Acts is that the Gospel/Word was proclaimed with the power of the Spirit. Hand-in-hand. It must be the same today.

Yes, we cannot rely on experience, but the person who said this (Sola) seems to have himself, relied on his -ve experiences in a charismatic church. One might as well add his -ve experience in a non-charismatic church and then come to opp conclusions.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.