Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A Complete Skull from Dmanisi
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mark kennedy" data-source="post: 64512811" data-attributes="member: 29337"><p>The Taung Child was regarded as a juvenile chimpanzee for nearly half a century while Author Keith and others celebrated the Piltdown hoax. The cranial capacity is small, even for a chimpanzee but no one would dare deny it's one of our ancestors. Raymond Dart, btw, is credited for coining the phrase 'Homo habilis' when Louis Leaky dismissed the cerebral rubicon. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't chase these posts in circles anymore. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It was originally interpreted as an ape, there was no real reason to conclude it was a hominid except the foramen magnum and the brow ridge. The fact that it stood 3' 6" (105 cm) and weighing about 2024 pounds (911 kg). It had a cranial capacity of 400500cc. That is a nearly identical description of a chimpanzee. BTW, I don't know how anyone could mistake it for a gorilla but I'm not chasing every little detail today. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Mutations are copy errors and a failure of DNA repair, get a handle on that concept and we can stop chasing this one in circles. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What happens when a mutation, say a point mutation is introduced to a protein coding gene? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Brain size is effected by brain related genes, you never really did get catch on to that concept did you? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No chimpanzee ancestors but an awful lot of chimpanzee skulls passed off as our ancestors. It's pretty obvious. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not even evidence, that's a brief description of some general news item. Why, is what I would like to know about Wolpoff et al. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wrong group, Christian apologetics calls it presupposition not conspiracy. Conspiracy theories are the pass time of your agnostic brethren. </p><p></p><p>Have a nice day <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>Mark</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mark kennedy, post: 64512811, member: 29337"] The Taung Child was regarded as a juvenile chimpanzee for nearly half a century while Author Keith and others celebrated the Piltdown hoax. The cranial capacity is small, even for a chimpanzee but no one would dare deny it's one of our ancestors. Raymond Dart, btw, is credited for coining the phrase 'Homo habilis' when Louis Leaky dismissed the cerebral rubicon. I don't chase these posts in circles anymore. It was originally interpreted as an ape, there was no real reason to conclude it was a hominid except the foramen magnum and the brow ridge. The fact that it stood 3' 6" (105 cm) and weighing about 2024 pounds (911 kg). It had a cranial capacity of 400500cc. That is a nearly identical description of a chimpanzee. BTW, I don't know how anyone could mistake it for a gorilla but I'm not chasing every little detail today. Mutations are copy errors and a failure of DNA repair, get a handle on that concept and we can stop chasing this one in circles. What happens when a mutation, say a point mutation is introduced to a protein coding gene? Brain size is effected by brain related genes, you never really did get catch on to that concept did you? No chimpanzee ancestors but an awful lot of chimpanzee skulls passed off as our ancestors. It's pretty obvious. That's not even evidence, that's a brief description of some general news item. Why, is what I would like to know about Wolpoff et al. Wrong group, Christian apologetics calls it presupposition not conspiracy. Conspiracy theories are the pass time of your agnostic brethren. Have a nice day :) Mark [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A Complete Skull from Dmanisi
Top
Bottom