Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
A Billion People Exposed to Climate Change Effects
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rambot" data-source="post: 74033731" data-attributes="member: 145797"><p>Yes. The "climate" is always changing. It changes .2 degree over 1000s of years. Except in the 20th century where it increases .2 degrees in 2 or 3 decades.</p><p></p><p>I'm curious how denuding even MORE of the earth's resources is actually going to HELP countries </p><p></p><p>Imagine that, instead of climate change we were talking about waste and garbage. It would be ludicrous to think that the BEST way to deal with waste and garbage would be to consume MORE of the same stuff that we do to create more waste and garbage. So how can it be that the consumption of more raw material, the processing, chemical treatment, the energy required for production, distribution, shipping and support, is going to help resolve the problem? It just doesn't make logical sense.</p><p></p><p>I get that people think that more money will solve hte problem. But the money has to get made in an INTELLIGENT way; not by doing the same thing we are doing already.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rambot, post: 74033731, member: 145797"] Yes. The "climate" is always changing. It changes .2 degree over 1000s of years. Except in the 20th century where it increases .2 degrees in 2 or 3 decades. I'm curious how denuding even MORE of the earth's resources is actually going to HELP countries Imagine that, instead of climate change we were talking about waste and garbage. It would be ludicrous to think that the BEST way to deal with waste and garbage would be to consume MORE of the same stuff that we do to create more waste and garbage. So how can it be that the consumption of more raw material, the processing, chemical treatment, the energy required for production, distribution, shipping and support, is going to help resolve the problem? It just doesn't make logical sense. I get that people think that more money will solve hte problem. But the money has to get made in an INTELLIGENT way; not by doing the same thing we are doing already. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
A Billion People Exposed to Climate Change Effects
Top
Bottom