Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
9/11 Science Club: Mass Does Not Accelerate as it Accumulates, It Can Only Slow Down
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Btodd" data-source="post: 62267588" data-attributes="member: 14939"><p>The phrase 'you propose' in that sentence is not referring to the person I was responding to personally, it's meant in the sense of 'whomever' is proposing it (he had linked to a video of someone else talking). And yes, there are such things as crackpot theories. I try to give questions the benefit of the doubt as to being sincere, but there are some things that are so inane that they don't deserve a serious response. Notice that I DID, however, give a serious response to the actual points brought up.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Clarification, up to a point. After a while, it's also the duty of the speaker to articulate their points more clearly.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I still don't know what you're referring to in regard to past media reports. I remember seeing pictures of the crash right after it happened, as well as later pictures of the collapsed portion, and being told it had collapsed in on the impact zone. It didn't lead me on any path of disinformation or confusion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think all of the details were fully collected and formed into a full timeline for quite some time. But things like the light poles being knocked down were reported by witnesses in the media that day and in following ones. Here's at least one example.</p><p></p><p><em>"Afework Hagos, a computer programmer, was on his way to work but stuck in a traffic jam near the Pentagon when the plane flew over. 'There was a huge screaming noise and I got out of the car as the plane came over. Everybody was running away in different directions. It was tilting its wings up and down like it was trying to balance. It hit some lampposts on the way in.'"</em></p><p> - "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." <em>The Guardian</em>, <strong>12 Sep 2001</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My reactions aren't singular in style. At times I'm sarcastic, but I've also laid out a lot of serious rebuttal time in this thread. I don't mind you pointing out when I'm sarcastic, but I do mind if you make it out as if I'm doing that more than providing actual substance to the discussion. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, this isn't about me or you, so we're getting off-track and bickering over things that also don't help the discussion, either. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Btodd</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Btodd, post: 62267588, member: 14939"] The phrase 'you propose' in that sentence is not referring to the person I was responding to personally, it's meant in the sense of 'whomever' is proposing it (he had linked to a video of someone else talking). And yes, there are such things as crackpot theories. I try to give questions the benefit of the doubt as to being sincere, but there are some things that are so inane that they don't deserve a serious response. Notice that I DID, however, give a serious response to the actual points brought up. Clarification, up to a point. After a while, it's also the duty of the speaker to articulate their points more clearly. I still don't know what you're referring to in regard to past media reports. I remember seeing pictures of the crash right after it happened, as well as later pictures of the collapsed portion, and being told it had collapsed in on the impact zone. It didn't lead me on any path of disinformation or confusion. I don't think all of the details were fully collected and formed into a full timeline for quite some time. But things like the light poles being knocked down were reported by witnesses in the media that day and in following ones. Here's at least one example. [I]"Afework Hagos, a computer programmer, was on his way to work but stuck in a traffic jam near the Pentagon when the plane flew over. 'There was a huge screaming noise and I got out of the car as the plane came over. Everybody was running away in different directions. It was tilting its wings up and down like it was trying to balance. It hit some lampposts on the way in.'"[/I] - "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." [I]The Guardian[/I], [B]12 Sep 2001[/B] My reactions aren't singular in style. At times I'm sarcastic, but I've also laid out a lot of serious rebuttal time in this thread. I don't mind you pointing out when I'm sarcastic, but I do mind if you make it out as if I'm doing that more than providing actual substance to the discussion. Anyway, this isn't about me or you, so we're getting off-track and bickering over things that also don't help the discussion, either. Btodd [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
9/11 Science Club: Mass Does Not Accelerate as it Accumulates, It Can Only Slow Down
Top
Bottom