Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
9/11 Science Club: Mass Does Not Accelerate as it Accumulates, It Can Only Slow Down
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="seeking Christ" data-source="post: 62266747"><p>From this side of the screen, our media pawned off the hole clean through the Pentagon (after <em>extensive</em> clean-up) as having been caused by the plane. I never really had problems with that, being much more focused on the towers, the subway system, and the ensuing wars. Still, that never seemed plausible to me, and I was RIGHT.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Correct! Not everyone with an opinion contrary to your own is an idiot. Neither is a 757 pilot with 30 some odd years of experience a nutjob, but I digress.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I never said anything to that effect, although that hasn't stopped people from making that assumption.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>EXACTLY! Responsible use of the reason freedom of the press was granted in the first place (dissemination of information) dictates that the pictures broadcast be accompanied by explanation that this hole is far larger than the damage left by the plane, and what we're looking at is collapse after the fact, rubble having been cleared away, edges having been cut off straight, etc. </p><p></p><p>And in this thread there are at least 2 good pictures of the actual hole left by the plane, after the smoke cleared. If our media couldn't get their hands on that well ok, but it seems like they weren't trying. Contrast that with all available footage of the towers on TV non-stop, and its a stark difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="seeking Christ, post: 62266747"] From this side of the screen, our media pawned off the hole clean through the Pentagon (after [I]extensive[/I] clean-up) as having been caused by the plane. I never really had problems with that, being much more focused on the towers, the subway system, and the ensuing wars. Still, that never seemed plausible to me, and I was RIGHT. Correct! Not everyone with an opinion contrary to your own is an idiot. Neither is a 757 pilot with 30 some odd years of experience a nutjob, but I digress. I never said anything to that effect, although that hasn't stopped people from making that assumption. EXACTLY! Responsible use of the reason freedom of the press was granted in the first place (dissemination of information) dictates that the pictures broadcast be accompanied by explanation that this hole is far larger than the damage left by the plane, and what we're looking at is collapse after the fact, rubble having been cleared away, edges having been cut off straight, etc. And in this thread there are at least 2 good pictures of the actual hole left by the plane, after the smoke cleared. If our media couldn't get their hands on that well ok, but it seems like they weren't trying. Contrast that with all available footage of the towers on TV non-stop, and its a stark difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
9/11 Science Club: Mass Does Not Accelerate as it Accumulates, It Can Only Slow Down
Top
Bottom