Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
9/11 Science Club: Mass Does Not Accelerate as it Accumulates, It Can Only Slow Down
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Btodd" data-source="post: 62254321" data-attributes="member: 14939"><p>In post #270, take a look at the photo. The brick is completely gone for the entire width of the plane. In the center is where the fuselage, the heaviest part of the plane, impacted. The tail was directly above the gaping hole where the fuselage went through the building.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've been through this for a over a decade now. Yes, there are some people who simply don't know the facts, have done nothing but peruse conspiracy sites for their information...but to believe that all of the steel from all 3 buildings completely melted shows that the person making the claim never bothered to check it out, or is being dishonest. Either way, I don't really care. I pointed out a simple picture that demolished that idea, and if it bothers you that I ridiculed the intent, that does nothing to refute what I posted a direct picture of. You don't have to like my style to admit that the claim he made was not only false, but grossly false.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll take your criticism more seriously when you start taking conspiracists to task for their ridicule. Even in their case, you need to focus on the arguments being presented, and not get sidetracked. The bottom line is...'What is the most likely explanation for this event?'</p><p></p><p>Which brings me to the question...<em>what is it</em>? Where did Flight 77 go, where did all of those passengers go, how did wreckage end up at the site while the building was still burning and the general public was watching the entire scene, who saw a missile, what do you make of the enormous amount of eyewitnesses who watched a plane fly into the building...what's the more likely explanation?</p><p></p><p>This isn't a game for me, and I assume you feel the same way.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Btodd</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Btodd, post: 62254321, member: 14939"] In post #270, take a look at the photo. The brick is completely gone for the entire width of the plane. In the center is where the fuselage, the heaviest part of the plane, impacted. The tail was directly above the gaping hole where the fuselage went through the building. I've been through this for a over a decade now. Yes, there are some people who simply don't know the facts, have done nothing but peruse conspiracy sites for their information...but to believe that all of the steel from all 3 buildings completely melted shows that the person making the claim never bothered to check it out, or is being dishonest. Either way, I don't really care. I pointed out a simple picture that demolished that idea, and if it bothers you that I ridiculed the intent, that does nothing to refute what I posted a direct picture of. You don't have to like my style to admit that the claim he made was not only false, but grossly false. I'll take your criticism more seriously when you start taking conspiracists to task for their ridicule. Even in their case, you need to focus on the arguments being presented, and not get sidetracked. The bottom line is...'What is the most likely explanation for this event?' Which brings me to the question...[I]what is it[/I]? Where did Flight 77 go, where did all of those passengers go, how did wreckage end up at the site while the building was still burning and the general public was watching the entire scene, who saw a missile, what do you make of the enormous amount of eyewitnesses who watched a plane fly into the building...what's the more likely explanation? This isn't a game for me, and I assume you feel the same way. Btodd [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
9/11 Science Club: Mass Does Not Accelerate as it Accumulates, It Can Only Slow Down
Top
Bottom