Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
4 Women Sue 'Girls Gone Wild' Founder Joe Francis for Underage Filming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jamesrwright3" data-source="post: 45340556"><p>I don't think simple nudity is considered to be inappropriate contentography..so I don't think filming your child in a bathtub would be considered to be inappropriate contentography. I think it has to be lewd and sexual in nature..and for purposes of sexual gratification. </p><p></p><p>I think in this case we need to split up the plaintiffs into two separate groups. If the 16 and 17 year old showed him fake ID indicating they were at least 18, then I think he may be off the hook for those two since there may not be much, if any, physical differences between a 16 or 17 year old and an 18 year old..I don't think they really have a case to get money from this guy. </p><p></p><p>However, that cannot be said for the 13 and 14 year olds. Those girls had to have looked like girls that could not have been above the age of legality..There is no way you can mistake a 13 year old girl for an 18 year old girl..no matter how mature she is...Even if these younger girls showed him fake IDs, he should have known something was fishy and erred on the side of caution...but legally they are still above the age of reason and could potentially have some liability as well for representing themselves as being of age, if they did. Whether they get any money depends on Florida law. In some states even if you are 1% liable for a tort, you cannot collect anything.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jamesrwright3, post: 45340556"] I don't think simple nudity is considered to be inappropriate contentography..so I don't think filming your child in a bathtub would be considered to be inappropriate contentography. I think it has to be lewd and sexual in nature..and for purposes of sexual gratification. I think in this case we need to split up the plaintiffs into two separate groups. If the 16 and 17 year old showed him fake ID indicating they were at least 18, then I think he may be off the hook for those two since there may not be much, if any, physical differences between a 16 or 17 year old and an 18 year old..I don't think they really have a case to get money from this guy. However, that cannot be said for the 13 and 14 year olds. Those girls had to have looked like girls that could not have been above the age of legality..There is no way you can mistake a 13 year old girl for an 18 year old girl..no matter how mature she is...Even if these younger girls showed him fake IDs, he should have known something was fishy and erred on the side of caution...but legally they are still above the age of reason and could potentially have some liability as well for representing themselves as being of age, if they did. Whether they get any money depends on Florida law. In some states even if you are 1% liable for a tort, you cannot collect anything. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
4 Women Sue 'Girls Gone Wild' Founder Joe Francis for Underage Filming
Top
Bottom