Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
My God? I'm not proving my God yet.
Sure it has arguments for the existence of God. Not mine though. As I pointed out those were Catholic Apologists. I'm a Messianic Jew.
No one claimed the FSM was intangible, only invisible. There is a difference between the two terms as even Antony Flew demonstrates in his example of the garden in the middle of the jungle
I'm not a Fideist though.
It might be getting old, but its still nonetheless true.
Right so what your saying is those were the arguments of chrisitans, and that your a christian.
I begin to see your problems.
I never claimed you were a fideist, which you don't have to capitalize, similar to atheism
Arguments by authority are logically fallacious and you would know that if you had even moderately studied logical argumentation.
Thats fine, but I disagree with Flew's understanding of God too.
I never claimed my authority and even if I had authority I never argued that it made my argument valid, so you're doubly mistaken in this subdiscussion alreadyYou are utilizing your authority here, so I guess thats logically fallacious.
Using your logic then your god cannot possibly be my "Father". As my father is very tangible and able to be touched.
I never claimed my authority and even if I had authority I never argued that it made my argument valid, so you're doubly mistaken in this subdiscussion already
When all other positions besides God are not true, it is NOT ad hoc special pleading. It is true by default. You don't follow the reasoning.
Its implicit in your claim. By utilizing your logic, logic can not proceed anywhere. Its the fault of your reasoning that your claim is self stultifying.
Thats an ANE understanding that eludes you. That in the sense of an Ancient Near East role of God, not a literal physical in form and substance father.
Your assumption that every other position besides "God" is not true is demonstrably mistaken since there are myriad definitions of that term itself, so you are making a claim that multiple contradicting positions are all true at the same time it would appear.
Few things are true by default except when they are self evident to any general observer with little intervention required. And "God" is not one of those things
Hahaha.
No, I'm sorry I understand exactly what I'm talking about.
You seem to want to move the goal posts.
FSM can't be god because you can touch spaghetti.
And yet my inability to touch what christians want to call my "Father" somehow doesn't mean that your god doesn't exist.
Hilarious.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?