• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Right, that's what I said
 
Upvote 0

Sultan Of Swing

Junior Member
Jan 4, 2015
1,801
787
✟9,476.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Or you could actually think about it yourself in an objective way and see what you discover.
Let's say you have a basket with one ball in it.

If you have two baskets with balls in them, you have 2x1, 2 lots of 1 ball, which equals 2.

If you have one basket, this is 1x1, one lot of 1, which is 1.
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Let's say you have a basket with one ball in it.

If you have two baskets with balls in them, you have 2x1, 2 lots of 1 ball, which equals 2.

If you have one basket, this is 1x1, one lot of 1, which is 1.

Got it! Now explain that to Howard
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Where's the contradiction?

If we're saying 'a' is different than 'b' then a and b cannot both equal 1.

If we're saying 'a' is the same as 'b' then we should just use one or the other, not both.

So one logical equation is a=1

Another logical equation is b=1

But it's illogical to say a=1 and b=1 in the same equation because it's assumed that a and b are different variables.
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,713
3,762
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟260,281.00
Faith
Atheist
Now 1x1 may equal 1.

But did ya know 1+1 also equals 1?

Let's say

a = 1
b = 1

a = b
a^2 = b^2
a^2 - b^2 = 0
(a-b)(a+b) = 0
(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)
1(a+b) = 0
(a+b) = 0
1 + 1 = 0
2 = 0
1 = 0
1 + 1 = 1

Goodbye Maths. It's been nice knowing you.

I'd say you know where this fails, don't you?

(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)
1(a+b) = 0

Aye, there's the rub that makes mathematical paradoxa of so long life.

You took (a-b)/(a-b) to be 1. This usually works perfectly, for every possible number.... except for 0. Any number divided by 0 is undefined in common arithmetics, even if it is 0 divided by 0.

And as a=b, (a-b) is 0.

Thus the rest of the expression is also undefined.


Nice try though. Hurray Maths!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,713
3,762
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟260,281.00
Faith
Atheist
Ouch, Chriliman, your mathskills really ARE a little dulled.

a=b is a completely and perfectly valid expression in mathematics. There is nothing illogical in it. Two variables can indeed hold the same value.

Yes, it means we can interchange them. In fact, this is the trick upon which this (faulty) expression rests. It makes it appear as if (a-b) is just an ordinary mathematical expression. But it isn't. If we were to exchange a for b, we would see that the term always comes down to (a-a)... which is of course 0.
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Ouch, Chriliman, your mathskills really ARE a little dulled.

a=b is a completely and perfectly valid expression in mathematics. There is nothing illogical in it. Two variables can indeed hold the same value.

If two variables hold the same value, then they should be considered the same variable, otherwise their value is meaningless.
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,713
3,762
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟260,281.00
Faith
Atheist
If two variables hold the same value, then they should be considered the same variable, otherwise their value is meaningless.
Err, no, not quite. A value is not in any way influenced by how many variables hold them.

If two variables hold the same value, they are considered equal. That is the whole point.

Usually, this is the endpoint of a calculation, not something to start with... but it is completely valid. Nothing illogical, nothing contradicting here.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Anyone care to explain why Howard is wrong?

1 group of 1 is . . . 1.

5 groups of 2 is 10. 2 groups of 5 are 10. 1 group of 5 is 5. 1 group of 1 is 1, not 2.

If you want to change this to binary, you might get some interesting answers.
 
Reactions: Chriliman
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

In this case the value was influenced by the variable because instead of 1+1=2 we get 1+1=1. Or a+b=1.

Whereas logically it should read a+a=2 or b+b=2 or 1+1=2 so the variable does not influence value.
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,713
3,762
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟260,281.00
Faith
Atheist
In this case the value was influenced by the variable because instead of 1+1=2 we get 1+1=1. Or a+b=1.

Whereas logically it should read a+a=2 or b+b=2 or 1+1=2 so the variable does not influence value.
Huh?

How do you ever get to the 1+1=1 part?

You are correct a+a=2. b+b also equals 2. (Assuming a and b are 1). But so would a+b equal 2.
 
Upvote 0

Sultan Of Swing

Junior Member
Jan 4, 2015
1,801
787
✟9,476.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
In this case the value was influenced by the variable because instead of 1+1=2 we get 1+1=1. Or a+b=1.

Whereas logically it should read a+a=2 or b+b=2 or 1+1=2 so the variable does not influence value.
@Freodin correctly said where the fault was, it's not to do with a=b which is perfectly valid.

If a=1 and b=1, a+b=2. This doesn't change anything.
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,713
3,762
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟260,281.00
Faith
Atheist
This last page just made my head hurt...
Mine too. But for the reason that I try to figure out how to display real mathematical equations on this forum.

Does anyone here know how MathJax works?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,066
7,423
31
Wales
✟427,275.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Mine too. But for the reason that I try to figure out how to display real mathematical equations on this forum.

Does anyone here know how MathJax works?

I still love how that's a distinction that exists: real maths and real maths.
 
Upvote 0