Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Fellowship and Games
Book Club
1984
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CryOfALion" data-source="post: 66527210" data-attributes="member: 358083"><p>Yes it is, in the same fashion Ray Bradbury's <u>Fahrenheit 451</u> illustrated the problem with burning books. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And essentially, hard print - script - has a class of authenticity to it. You can change the words of anything when it is simply digital because the original footprints can fall victim to revisionist history if done away with. How can I say with certainty that Oedipus Complexes are focal on inappropriate son-mother relationships if Oedipus is amended to say he gouged his eyes out after finding out he slept with a sorcerer, for example? Where would the physical, hard proof come from if not the actual book?</p><p></p><p>"Manuscripts" are what vindicate the authenticity of most all stories, religion and history. Not the cloud.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CryOfALion, post: 66527210, member: 358083"] Yes it is, in the same fashion Ray Bradbury's [U]Fahrenheit 451[/U] illustrated the problem with burning books. And essentially, hard print - script - has a class of authenticity to it. You can change the words of anything when it is simply digital because the original footprints can fall victim to revisionist history if done away with. How can I say with certainty that Oedipus Complexes are focal on inappropriate son-mother relationships if Oedipus is amended to say he gouged his eyes out after finding out he slept with a sorcerer, for example? Where would the physical, hard proof come from if not the actual book? "Manuscripts" are what vindicate the authenticity of most all stories, religion and history. Not the cloud. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Fellowship and Games
Book Club
1984
Top
Bottom