Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I wouldn't necessarily argue against you here. 1 employee is certainly no negotiating match for a billion dollar firm, unless he is in such high demand and limited supply. But we're not necessarily talking about an employee only competing against a firm for wages ( which is impossible anyway), but also employees competing against each other for wages. What about an employee who is willing to work for what some would consider sub par wages? Should he be legislated out of the labor market? And why?
All together, employees make up the supply of labor ( or the demand for wages....however you want to look at it). Employers make up the demand. A glut of people competing for work will bring down wages (all else being equal). Legislating price of labor will only price some employees out of the market.
[serious];64753798 said:We are well aware that some people are of that opinion. Posting a link to one such person with that opinion doesn't really further the discussion.
Here are several academic approaches that offer a bit more than opinion:
http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/min-wage-2013-02.pdf
http://econweb.tamu.edu/jmeer/Meer_West_Minimum_Wage.pdf
http://www.stanford.edu/class/econ101c/class2.pdf
Try out this scenario.
We raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. As a result, McDonalds doubles their prices. Since the middle class hasn't seen any increase in real income since Obama took office, we cut back on the number of meals we buy at McDonalds. As a result, McDonalds cuts back on their staff.
Your source says it all:
"The voluminous literature on minimum wages offers little consensus on the extent to which a wage floor impacts employment."
In other words, they don't have a clue.
Why would McDonald's double their prices? Hiking the minimum wage to $15/hr would be roughly double the current minimum. The only way that McDonald's would have to double their prices in order to maintain their profit margins would be if labor accounted for 100% of their expenses.
But labor doesn't account for 100% of their expenses. The cost of raw materials (food), utilities, real estate, insurance, and managerial salaries aren't going to double with this wage hike.
Yes, prices will have to go up in order to maintain profits, but the only way they'd go up double is if McDonald's decided to raise prices in order to increase profits. In that case, it's McDonald's fault, not the government's.
How much of the cost of McDonald's food is labor?
Roughly a third of their expenses are labor: About that 68-Cent Big Mac Price Increase | MinimumWage.com
This is a wonderful illustration of crab mentality.If the minimum wage gets increased to $15 from $7.25...what's to become of the people already making $15?
Let's say a person has worked for 5-6 years in a factory environment to get their pay up to that level, you're essentially knocking them back down to square one...I can see that causing some cases of disgruntled employees. (especially when you consider that within a year or two, that $15 doesn't quite have the buying power it once did).
Raising the minimum wage by that drastic of an amount would undoubtedly cause some increases in prices (increases varying based on the type of business a person's running).
Doubling the minimum wage like that would essentially be giving everyone else a small pay decrease in order to subsidize a large pay increase for a select few once you factor in price increases and inflation.
This is a wonderful illustration of crab mentality.
I take issue thus:I'd call it reality. What part do you take issue with?
This is irrelevant to whether or not the minimum wage should be raised. It is an emotional appeal to keep minimum wage low based on crab mentality.If the minimum wage gets increased to $15 from $7.25...what's to become of the people already making $15?
Again, this is not an argument against raising the minimum wage. This hypothetical worker isnt getting knocked down to square one. Also, the going rate for labor in a factory in America is such that if one is only making $15/hour after 5-6 years, they have greater problems than some poor schmuck getting a minimum wage hike.Let's say a person has worked for 5-6 years in a factory environment to get their pay up to that level, you're essentially knocking them back down to square one...
This is again crab mentality.I can see that causing some cases of disgruntled employees.
Buying power has already been destroyed by stagnant wages and inflation. Hiking the minimum wage would not cause anywhere near the damage that stagnant wages have already caused.(especially when you consider that within a year or two, that $15 doesn't quite have the buying power it once did).
An increase in the working class wage would also undoubtedly lead to much greater aggregate demand, as much if not more than an increase in price would cause a decrease.Raising the minimum wage by that drastic of an amount would undoubtedly cause some increases in prices (increases varying based on the type of business a person's running).
Wrong. Increasing the minimum wage would not decrease someone else s wage. Furthermore, if a factory worker feels that they are not being paid their fair wage then they should ask for a raise themselves rather than attacking the minimum wage worker who received a long-deserved wage.Doubling the minimum wage like that would essentially be giving everyone else a small pay decrease
There is little to no evidence that raising the minimum wage would increase inflation.in order to subsidize a large pay increase for a select few once you factor in price increases and inflation.
If the minimum wage gets increased to $15 from $7.25...what's to become of the people already making $15?
Let's say a person has worked for 5-6 years in a factory environment to get their pay up to that level, you're essentially knocking them back down to square one...I can see that causing some cases of disgruntled employees. (especially when you consider that within a year or two, that $15 doesn't quite have the buying power it once did).
If those workers didn't automatically get a pay raise (and I'd be surprised if they didn't, but for the sake of argument, let's say they didn't), there would be, at the very least, pressure on that employer to raise his wages, because he no longer has the hiring advantages (namely, being selective) that come with paying 2x minimum wage. The employees that wanted to work for him for the higher pay now have more options at that pay tier, so if the factory owner wants to retain those employees (or hire employees of a similar caliber), he'll need to raise his pay rates in order to be more attractive.
By getting rid of the minimum wage you would give private entities even more coercive power over the working class. It has little to do with markets and much more to do with greed and exploitation.That makes a good argument for doing away with any minimum wage, and allow the free market to set the wage.
That makes a good argument for doing away with any minimum wage, and allow the free market to set the wage.
By getting rid of the minimum wage you would give private entities even more coercive power over the working class. It has little to do with markets and much more to do with greed and exploitation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?