Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
“The Courts wouldn’t Allow it”.........Impeachment??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="com7fy8" data-source="post: 73997734" data-attributes="member: 331347"><p>When people spoke down on President Barack Obama, he said something like > you can say whatever you want, but I'm the President and you aren't. I think the meaning was that he had what it took to become President, no matter what anyone said about him. </p><p></p><p>And President Donald has managed to get about half of America's voters to select him. And it seems he is being offered for impeachment about things which voters have been able to investigate before they decided to vote for him. So, if he qualifies for impeachment > such voters . . . half or so of American voters . . . collaborated with him getting in. So, how reasonable were the sources which accused him before the American voters put him in? If they were legally credible, it could be edible that those voters also need to be prosecuted . . . or not??</p><p></p><p>He guaranteed how he would indict Hillary, but he did not keep his word. He promised the wall, and ones voted him in. </p><p></p><p>I am curious if there needs to be an amendment that requires a candidate to keep promises . . . which on the ballot, maybe, voters certify must be done.</p><p></p><p>For example, if a candidate promises to double funds for local schools, the voters can check off this promise, along with their vote for that candidate, and the candidate and others in office must keep that promise, by constitutional law. There would be specified items on the ballot, which voters could enforce.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="com7fy8, post: 73997734, member: 331347"] When people spoke down on President Barack Obama, he said something like > you can say whatever you want, but I'm the President and you aren't. I think the meaning was that he had what it took to become President, no matter what anyone said about him. And President Donald has managed to get about half of America's voters to select him. And it seems he is being offered for impeachment about things which voters have been able to investigate before they decided to vote for him. So, if he qualifies for impeachment > such voters . . . half or so of American voters . . . collaborated with him getting in. So, how reasonable were the sources which accused him before the American voters put him in? If they were legally credible, it could be edible that those voters also need to be prosecuted . . . or not?? He guaranteed how he would indict Hillary, but he did not keep his word. He promised the wall, and ones voted him in. I am curious if there needs to be an amendment that requires a candidate to keep promises . . . which on the ballot, maybe, voters certify must be done. For example, if a candidate promises to double funds for local schools, the voters can check off this promise, along with their vote for that candidate, and the candidate and others in office must keep that promise, by constitutional law. There would be specified items on the ballot, which voters could enforce. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
“The Courts wouldn’t Allow it”.........Impeachment??
Top
Bottom