Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
‘It’s All Over’ — Donald Trump Cites Gordon Sondland’s Testimony as Impeachment Exoneration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SimplyMe" data-source="post: 74498089" data-attributes="member: 9588"><p>When do witnesses ever give testimony of a specific crime? Witnesses are to provide "witness" as to the events they saw and heard. Witnesses are not expected to be legal experts and explain how what they saw fits the legal definitions of a crime, they are only expected to truthfully testify to what they saw and heard.</p><p></p><p>In this case, it is up to the members of Congress to determine, based on the testimony of the witnesses, to determine if the testimony they heard proves that the President is guilty of impeachable acts; just as in a criminal trial (or grand jury, which is more similar to the House proceedings) the jury would determine if the testimony was evidence of a crime -- and what crime (particularly with grand juries, which is the closest criminal jury to Impeachment by the House).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SimplyMe, post: 74498089, member: 9588"] When do witnesses ever give testimony of a specific crime? Witnesses are to provide "witness" as to the events they saw and heard. Witnesses are not expected to be legal experts and explain how what they saw fits the legal definitions of a crime, they are only expected to truthfully testify to what they saw and heard. In this case, it is up to the members of Congress to determine, based on the testimony of the witnesses, to determine if the testimony they heard proves that the President is guilty of impeachable acts; just as in a criminal trial (or grand jury, which is more similar to the House proceedings) the jury would determine if the testimony was evidence of a crime -- and what crime (particularly with grand juries, which is the closest criminal jury to Impeachment by the House). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
‘It’s All Over’ — Donald Trump Cites Gordon Sondland’s Testimony as Impeachment Exoneration
Top
Bottom