Search results

I am 20.

I didn't learn ANYTHING about science in Sunday School. I learned ALL of this on my own. Evolution has been falsified, yet it's posing as an undisputable fact.

I have sinned against God and Theistic Evolutionists. I said they call Jesus a liar.Now, realize, after talking to my parents, that we must accept EVERYONE. I'm sorry, TEs. I put it under this forum because this is where my insults came from.

The smallest known dinosaur was Mussaurus, which weighed, fully grown, 150 pounds. Try getting THAT thing to fly. Do THESE look like flying birds? http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?_adv_prop=images&imgsz=all&vf=all&va=archaeopteryx&ei=UTF-8&fr=slv1-msgr&b=1 You've never tried...

Change NEVER results in a new species, neither does natural selection. You're as bad a liar as Pinnochio. You haven't given any EVIDENCE it repolarizes. Also, how come the population growth fits eight people from 4,400 years ago?

You expect me to fall for such a pitiful lie? Pinnochio's a better liar. We have NO evidence the magnetic field repolarates, that was made to explain away the evidence, as usual. We know it decays, but it doesn't repolarize. I NEVER changed my definition of Evolution, the...

On the whole, though, this is still a gappy transition, consisting of a very large-scale series of "cousin" fossils. Even the smallest dinosaurs were WAY too large to have turned into birds. You also need a whole different skeleton, different lungs, a different brain, turn scales into...

Wrong. Evolution from Darwin meant change from one species into another. Now it just means change. This word is evolving. It works by random mutations and the mutations are chosen by natural selection. Unfortunately, it's been disproven with the magnetic field showing the Earth is only a...

How about THIS claim? We have NO links between birds and reptiles. It's a little easier said than done. Actually, many Evolutionists, including Stephen J. Gould, admitted they BELIEVE Evolution because the only alternative is special Creation, and that is unthinkable. As to evidence, here...

I understand evolutionism.

Is it a fair murder trial if only one side is heard?

Probably because you throw my evidence out. It was a plesiosaur because it had a long neck. Sort of like a giraffe neck. Evolution is based on MYTHS. Evolution is based on NO EVIDENCE. Even the most basic laws of the universe say it's a dud. If it's so true, why are so many scientists...

Yes it would. If we found a trilobite fossil, we'd say they survived for 500 million years. It wouldn't be a good index fossil. As to the plesiosaur, here is the link. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/somerset/3603507.stm Btw, it WOULD affect Evolution because a dinosaur has to evolve to...

I am actually very familiar with BOTH sides, yet I accept Creation as more scientific.

Actually, men have actually SEEN dinosaurs. http://www.labyrinthina.com/ica.htm

A certain man was accused of murder. The prosecutor presented his case, showed his evidence, and condemned the man. The man's side was never heard. Would you call that a fair trial?

Creation science is merely accepting Creation on scientific grounds.

Why do you call me a troll?

No. I am referring to another incident. Also, plesiosaurs aren't quite extinct. Lochness Monster is said to be a plesiosaur by almost everyone who's seen it.

When a plesiosaur washed onto the beach in California, it was classified as a shark. As to Evolution being science, it's based SOLELY on faith. Most of the dating methods, without any explaining away, say Earth's not 4.5 billions of years old. Btw, Creationists weren't the ones using the...