There are quite a few Southern Baptist men along with their wives in the Gideons International ministry in our area. It's a well documented way to reach the lost with God's Word in spite of them not wanting to attend a church or listen to an evangelist on the street.
My support for the assertion that the scientists are absolutely positive the "God didn't do it"
The above is the opening transcript from the Dover Trial
What if the school board just wanted to introduce a more plausible explaination of life and its origin? No can do -- because the high...
The high priests of science won't let the creation story be told in science class, even though it better explains the evidence for origin of life and the classification of living things better than evolution does. And their argument for such intolerance is that the Bible isn't based on science...
I'm saying the Bible can be trusted when it comes to the important things like:
" For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and...
scripture was without error when it was inspired, but error was introduced through time, just as with any information source - like our DNA which was perfect when God wrote it in Adam, but degenerated over time. This would be two examples of scientific observation -- but evol scientists declare...
they haven't the slightest clue as to how life formed - but they are ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE that God didn't do it. The diligent search for truth and knowledge -- er "science" you say?
Even evol scientists think yesterday's theory on origin of life describes a "stupendously improbable accident," -- I wonder if the theory that God created life just as He said he did is now less stupendously improbable to them.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-05/uocp-smi051606.php
Let me elaborate: "Moses" == "Torah" first five books of the Old Testament -- GENESIS, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Dueteronomy. If you do not listen to the author of Genesis, you will not be convinced even by Jesus Himself.
How many babies die for the sake of "prochoice"? Is the idea that the prince of the fallen world would try to kill the Messiah before he is born unlikely? I think not.
Matthew's gospel was written to Jews about Jesus the King and elaborated on fulfilled prophesy. Mark wrote to the Romans about Jesus the servant. Luke wrote to Theopholus about Jesus the man, and John wrote to believers about mystical side of Jesus, the Word of God. That's pretty independant...
The post said 100 OR thousands, but I wouldn't be surprised if a hundred of thousand didn't benefit directly from miracles. Jesus was persued by great multitudes for 3 years, "healing every sickness and every disease"
I believe the Bible rather than the Quran because the Bible was written by more than forty different authors recording events that all come together to reveal the same story of a God who created us, lost us to sin and Satan, and is determined to redeem us and restore us to HHis original...
Actually, if you treat it as evidence and pursue it to see where it leads with your eyes open, you'll see that the Gospel accounts were all written by eye witnesses except for Luke. And much of Luke's account came from eye witnesses such as Mary, Jesus mother. Futhermore, the style of the...
But there is documented evidence.
This is testimony by someone bent on wiping out Christianity at its beginning.
Some of the five hundred he refers to as seeing and even touching the resurrected Jesus were put into prison or stoned by Paul.
So you see, there's hope for you too!
I tried to keep the evidence to its simplest form, but you're not seeing it are you. The existance of anything is evidence of God because He's the one who wrote the laws that keep electrons in there orbit around protons in atoms, keeping negative and positive charges equal, bonding molocules...