Search results

Well what is an adicionado?

Yes that is what I stated in the first message. It have basicly boiled down to the point where women in certain areas has to choose between harassment or covered hair. Actually it's quite common, the female support service (dunno about the english name) in Gävle (my homecity) reports that they...

Since when did the muslem women become innocent bystanders? They are still playing in the same team so naturally they suffer from the punishment and since islam is a male dominated society in the more fundamentalist circuits (where scarfs etc are popular) is it also natural to assume that it's...

First of all sorry about the colourful language Mike, I'm just not really used to use the slightly more tip toeing way of speech that you english speakers use. Did you even read my post? I've already explained why the French government decided what they did and who's doing the oppression (ie...

So we should let a few people opress the masses? I think that sort of society also begins with a F...

Lol that's the funniest article ever (the onion is a joke news website btw). Salvation and eigth army detachments deployed to make sure everyone takes the day off... And you should really read the article abit better (or check by at a shrink to make sure everything works as it should, no one...

Yes becuase the number of people not wearing it is greater than the number of people not wearing it. And besides it's pretty natural that you make sure you go against the will of the ones who are harassing. Sure in an utopian world would the police have been able to catch the offenders and...

The problem is that some not so very tolerant muslems started to sexually harass anyone not wearing a scarf. This have been an escalating problem in France for a few years and now have the government forcefully stopped it. They did have to sacrifice some rights inorder to protect the womens...

The truth is that each person got his own truth. Every person thinks he is right but anyone disagreeing think that he is wrong.

So people tell you that science and religion doesn't have anything to do with eachother apart from science being a useful tool for reading gods greatest book, the universe. And this is how you respond? Oh dear, some people just doesn't want to understand it...

I though twe already had gone through all this. The Miller soup is mentioned as a way to get amino acids, not as the actual way to get them. The cambrian explosion is mentioned and the falsification of peppered moths was a lie. John think about it, is it really worth it to bear false witness...

Does this mean that coconuts are holy since they are the ones causing the holy ****?

Where do you currently live (city, country, etc)? Gävle, Sweden What is your educational background and/or current occupation? I'm a student on the science program and the Swedish agent of Black Tree Design. What are you current religious beliefs (if any)? None, I guess god will fry me becuase...

But I said Evilution... You however put it in the same sentence and your not a hypocrit as far as I know so I suppose that you'll be a head shorter the next time I see you. Btw when we are done with creation talk should we go and blast theology web :D.

Well I've already done my first post down there. Now I await the rest of you (btw you forgot Phantom Llama). For evilution and atheism! Onwards to glory my dear fiend friends ;). We really need a charging horse avatar ;).

Oh dear, well there isn't much opposition on this board so I guess we can branch out and cleanse those boards too :D.

Armageddon=the stuff you read about in revelations. Well I'm an atheist so I don't have any special insights...

*is still waiting for someone to admit that he or she is dumb enough to not know what the *beep* means".

Well the intro to your message and the fact that you posted it in the wrong forum gave alot of people the impression that your just another thickheaded creationist that doesn't deserve anything else than to be made fun of. However I took the liberty to read the last part of it. Your alot more...

Well different cultures got different morals. Therefor it's hard to jude on a basis on right or wrong. A much more efficent way of deciding what's moral is by deciding morality on if it causes more suffering than joy. For example killing someone will generally cause alot of suffering so it's...