Search results

As well as the stories and mythology of not-so-real, mythological people.

And then when asked to explain how, you provided nothing but excuses not to.

You have no use for him -- clearly, that's your problem, not his.

Anyone else makes an incorrect conclusion based on incomplete information, and are deceived by appearances. You know the truth -- you simply choose to ignore it for obvious reasons. He had no eyes yesterday; he has eyes today. Ergo, his eyes are new. AV is not God -- for that matter...

So, who says it's the Atheists who are going to destroy the Earth? Ah, right -- you.

Ussher can take a hike.

The rock-maker at his deceptive best, actually.

You tell me what you are first and foremost -- An American, or a Christian? Of of these Kingdoms is vulnerable, the other is not.

I had no idea Dylan was that old... :P

Yes, yes.... "cogito ergo sum." Too bad you have no proof that anything exists besides yourself. ...which, I suppose, is more or less how creationists prefer it.

So, you still have nothing but excuses, then.

Far enough that even Conservatives can benefit from it.

If anecdotal evidence is all you have, so be it -- at least give us an example of something you claim to have seen, and we'll decide for ourselves if there's a possible causal connection.

So that's why you can't explain it...

Religion in the case of institutionalized beliefs as a means of social control.

Well, like any bureaucracy, there's a bit of a backlog. They did get around to pardoning Galileo a couple of decades ago, after all.

So truth is a new premise in this hypothetical? Not surprising. Indeed -- for the purposes of this hypothetical, it's actual age doesn't matter, does it? The point would be that it's a number you use, which has no bearing whatsoever to this new premise of "truth" that you're struggling with.

It encourages him.

There's a certain naivety to people who embrace trickle-down economics based on the belief (hope, really) that it will eventually trickle down to them.

Fair enough -- the $10,000 offer is from a former Minnesota professor, who is now who is now director of the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics.