Search results

The generation of new alleles from an already existing gene (allele of that gene) by mutations is microevolution, for alleles to arise where the gene never existed is abiogenesis.

I understand, there are no experts here to debate with that understand the physics and mathematics of biological evolution. But at least Warden has learned how evolutionary competition is a first law of thermodynamics process. If I were you, I wouldn't want to defend any of the so-called...

No, they are little people with a giant fantasy. Hans, I understand you haven't done any study in this area and have no expertise on this subject but the evolution of drug resistance and the failure of cancer treatments are microevolutionary processes. And those processes are predicted by the...

These authors don't seem to think there is any ambiguity: Structure of avian loop of Henle as related to countercurrent multiplier system - PubMed

Read carefully what they wrote: If the "junk" portions of the genome are conserved, they shouldn't have to cherry-pick small alignable subfractions of the genome to determine relatedness. It has to do with what I bold-faced from the quote above from tas's link. When doing statistical analysis...

Now tas wants to discuss abiogenesis. tas is now going to present his mathematical model of macroevolution and present experimental evidence that substantiates that model. NOT! Whatever it is that you do, it isn't the correct explanation of the evolution of drug resistance and why cancer...

Why don't you read your own link?

Breeding of variants with specific alleles that already exist in the gene pool. I don't expect citations from macroevolutionists, I expect citations from those with a serious interest in dealing with the problem of drug resistance and failed cancer treatments. Do you think two centuries of...

Did you even read your own links you dumb cluck? This paper is making my argument against junk DNA! Now, if you want to see how macroevolutionists bungle the mathematics of phylogenetics, read this link: How to build a phylogenetic tree Now let's see if the biologist that has a couple of...

When it comes to a scientific explanation of microevolution I do have the answers. Those answers predicted the behavior of the Kishony experiment before it was performed and simulates the Lenski experiment very accurately. It also explains why 3 drug therapy works for the treatment of HIV, why...

Non-Coding DNA But some might say that the US government is some kind of cult.

You have already demonstrated that you did not understand the physics and mathematics of evolutionary competition and it's clear that you still don't understand the physics and mathematics of microevolutionary adaptation. And I've given you the reason why microevolutionary adaptation is limited...

Well, if you think the evolution of reptiles into birds is within the realm of scientific possibility, you certainly haven't explained how that genetic transformation can occur. I've given my answer, you just don't like it. If you have a scientific explanation of how reptiles evolve into birds...

I'm not saying that a mutation can't create a variant that can't interbreed with the parent species. But that new variant may have difficulty finding a mate. You might get a situation where two different variants might not be able to physically breed because of some limitation. For example...

I can give you a scientific explanation of the way biological evolution works and it demonstrates both mathematically and empirically that diversity of species cannot occur by this process. There is no scientific explanation for the massive diversity of species and to cling to a mathematically...

In theory, they can, but the microevolutionary steps don't add up. Adaptive microevolutionary steps are random occurrences and you compute the joint probability of random events occurring by multiplying their individual probabilities of occurring. You don't add these probabilities. That's why it...

Read the quote from that link carefully, it says "uncatalyzed half-life". Are you claiming that abiogenesis is not part of the biologist dogma? And I mention junk DNA (which is also part of the biologist dogma) because one of the posters mentioned that both reptiles and birds can have a gene...

Because experiments give a repeatable way to observe a physical phenomenon and correlate any theory you might have of that phenomenon with reality. In your case, for example, you were not aware that evolutionary competition is a first law of thermodynamics process. The Lenski experiment...

You do know that reptiles don't have a loop of Henle and birds do? If you don't know what a loop of Henle is, look it up.

Give us one experiment, just one, that you claim confirms macroevolution, and let's discuss that experiment. Fossil tea-leaf readers construct phylogenetic trees to fit their theory. The only correct way to construct a phylogenetic tree is using genetics, actual genetic sequences. Do you have...