Search results

  1. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    You're entitled to your opinion. Anywho, Ever hear of a prosecutor being commissioned to exonerate anybody? oh well. Gotta get some sleep. Ya'll have a good night and God Bless. :prayer:
  2. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    And who pays attention to Trump? What with 92% negative news coverage who could ignore the onslaught of left wing media?
  3. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    I do not attempt to sway anyone's beliefs. It doesn't work and only leads to contention. Oh, and I'm not worried. I am interested to learn though what actually started all this and it wasn't the Steele Dossier as many are apt to believe. Frankly I'll be watching the airlines. lol It's not a...
  4. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Hey, whatever ya know? Bottom line/s: The DOJ isn't going to charge Trump. Pelosi is not going to support proceedings for impeachment.
  5. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    "We have to determine whether there is clear violation of the law and so we applied the standards we would normally apply. We analyzed the law and the facts and a group of us spent a lot of time doing that and determined that both as a matter of law, many of the instances would not amount to...
  6. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Assumption of criminal acts has little basis without substantial evidence to support a charge of a crime committed. It leaves the rule of law behind for the politics of public opinion. In this country a person is innocent until proven guilty beyond the shadow of doubt. And right now under the...
  7. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Not going to happen. Just fodder for the democratic base. So the house moves forward with impeachment, the senate disagrees and Trump is cleared. Totally. Talk about game over. Pelosi knows this. But the new flock of progressives don't see it. And neither does the base. On another note... I...
  8. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Anyway, I need to get ready for work. Don't want anyone thinking I'm ignoring them. The afternoon shift. We're not allowed to "text" and work being that it's kinda against company policy. lol Catch ya'll tomorrow. :wave:
  9. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    No claim. Nadler knows the laws that were passed back then and why. Yet, he expected Barr to act illegally. When Barr would not cross that line then he was accused of bias. To the casual news reader that would appear as if Barr was/is indeed on Trump's side. A cover up if you will. Again, if...
  10. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Ok, so why is Nadler investigating for obstruction if the evidence is out there for all to see? Two years of investigating not enough? BTW, Has anyone ever done a comparison between the Starr report and the Mueller report? The Starr report was very explicit about evidence uncovered. But the...
  11. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    After the report was made public Trump could do these things. Had he done them during the investigation then he would be cited as being obstructive as his lawyers had advised. But now things have changed. He can now fight back against those false allegations. And I don't blame him. An innocent...
  12. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    I can say this though. If I were being accused of something I did not do I'd be against any and all effort to be framed too.
  13. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Then how do some readers come to the conclusion there is solid evidence of obstruction?
  14. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Probably? I think this whole thing is based on probably. So far there hasn't been any press concerning exactly what "evidence" is being interpreted as solid... just "read the report" or Op Eds one way or another.... just opinion pieces that have no legs to stand up in court. Useful maybe for...
  15. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Maybe Nadler should read the whole thing so he wouldn't have to put forth the effort to find evidence of obstruction. Would save a lot of time I think. And taxpayer money who already shelled out $40 million for Mueller's report.
  16. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    If there is so much solid evidence of obstruction in Mueller's report then why is Nadler investigating for obstruction of justice?
  17. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    What exactly in the whole of volume II stands out as solid evidence of obstruction?
  18. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    It wasn't Mueller's job to exonerate Trump.
  19. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    Obstruction? Thought the whole premise of the investigation was collusion. Ok So what evidence of obstruction exactly are you referring to?
  20. P

    "If we had confidence that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have said so"

    All this effort, money spent, 500 witnesses subpoenaed ,26 lawyers and no solid evidence. What is left is innuendo, supposition and biased opinion. If there is a solid case then show the solid evidence to support it. But after these years of investigation with nothing but political opinion as...