Search results

We call them entities. We meet them in a different dimension where time/space does not exist.

yes

The consipiracy of the flat earth existed long before the Internet. My point was, how can you welcome knowledge of a flat earth if there is no evidence that it exists?

I would welcome that knowledge if there were evidence. Even a photograph or video would be sufficient yet we sit here and one has yet to surface. Hundreds of humans have witnessed the Earth from space yet not one ever reported seeing a flat Earth.

Whoever wrote this obviously has no clue about DMT. When done right it will leave you speechless and completely change your view on reality and life itself.

I believe this reality is nothing more than a controlled hallucination.

What if human beings really are just a small part of God?

Aliens are real but you will never make contact with them without the right technology.

Flat Earthers, what are your excuses now? LightSail 2 Just Gifted Us Stunning New Pictures of Our Little Blue Marble From Space

Once again you have no clue what you are talking about and your statement makes no sense whatsover. If there was interference then they would not have detected helium hydride's infrared signature around a dying star. Additionally, they used terahertz spectroscopy which detects and controls...

A claim is finding something without evidence. They found evidence of the existence of HeH+ in nearby interstellar space. So your statement is incorrect.

No evidence that it is an Electric Plasmoid and there is absolutely no evidence for this Electric Universe nonsense.

Scientists using @SOFIAtelescope have located helium hydride in our own galaxy. It is a contributor to the formation of the 1st stars. Unveil our cosmic beginnings. The Universe’s First Type of Molecule Is Found at Last Illustration of planetary nebula NGC 7027 and helium hydride molecules. In...

This is no different than capturing ultraviolet light from the sun and rendering the image. Whether it’s ultraviolet light, infrared light, visible light, or radio, the process is the same to create the image for humans to be able to see with the naked eye. Not sure why you think it's rubbish.

Actually if you want to get technical images from video cameras are created from light sensitive microchips but I get what you are saying.

With video equipment though the images are not created from imaging software. The images are created when they are recorded. I don't think that falls under CGI as CGI images are created by software.

Look SpaceX just launched a rocket into space again, views from multiple angles. Must be fake right? CGI?

It's not subjective. It's based on real data. "SMDH"

Once again, spoken like a true zealot who has no clue how the real world works. They convert the signals to a picture. If our eyes were designed to see radio waves instead of light, the picture is what we would see. If you just took an actual picture you wouldn't see anything because the naked...