Search results

You did not acknowledge, address or refute my scientific argument. My conclusions still stand. You did not acknowledge, address or refute my exegetical argument. Instead, you provided a lame word study of yasa and lemed that did not even distinguish between the various Hebrew word stems and...

First of all, you talk as though the entire scientific community agrees with your opinion, which it does not. Your position is not a scientific fact. You are promoting your metaphysical or religious opinion under the guise of science. Just because the single cell has a certain combination of...

Hi SPF, Thank you for your response; however, it is difficult to believe that you actually read my post in entirety. My specialty area is in the Biblical languages. I have been reading the Bible in its original languages for almost forty years now, and I can tell you that your interpretation is...

THE BIBLE SAYS NOTHING ABOUT ABORTION The Bible contains no texts about abortion. Most of the so-called “prooftexts” state nothing about personhood at conception, but are a testament to God’s divine foreknowledge. For example: One of the most popular texts to support the anti-abortion...

On September 21, 2017, I made a post demonstrating that there is no modern science in the Bible. To a sensible person, the contents were irrefutable. Fundamentalists have responded in their usual irrational and incoherent manner, because they are suffering from cognitive dissonance, which...