Search results

  1. jamesbond007

    I am stuck thinking I need to prove faith to Evolutionists, when the Bible says "they're deluded"

    >>A lot of evolutionary changes are due to just that not different genes!<< It's natural selection that drives these changes. Many creationists think natural selection and biological evolution are separate ideas. One is God based while the other is atheist based. This is a great example...
  2. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    Chapter 10. I think he discusses invisible wormholes. When did he start believing in multiverse? One needs something to go back to. Also, do you believe one can travel into the future? You should now if you didn't believe it before.
  3. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    You're not reading the right articles and there are things you do not know because you're atheist and are easily fooled. First, I worked for the company that built the Hubble telescope. In fact, for a time it was right next door to my office. After that, most of us didn't know its exact...
  4. jamesbond007

    Is the star of Bethlehem making a comeback?

    I doubt the star of Bethlehem is making a comeback because only the three magi saw it. It told them that Jesus was born and where he was (not exact location). They had to travel far 800 - 900 miles so Jesus may have not been an infant anymore. They went to Jerusalem, the capital of Israel, to...
  5. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    Again, the creation scientists and I have the the accelerated expansion of the universe, colliding galaxies, dark matter, and dark energy. There's also the electromagnetic spectrum that provides all the energy in the universe. God created it the first day. "And God said, Let there be light...
  6. jamesbond007

    The Full Spectrum of Christian Belief on Origins - where are you?

    I'm learning about Moses and the people of his time. These are whom we should call prehistoric people if we descended from Adam and Eve. No people lived in caves such as the Neanderthals. That is just evolution (scientific atheism) mythology. Solid 3.
  7. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    I have evidence using science. There is no multiverse, so one can't go back in time. It's strange that Hawking and several others believe this hyposteses.
  8. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    I've done walkthroughs as my career wasn't in the physical sciences. I can't believe how wrong you are. Creation science is the real science. You really need to learn a thing or two as atheist (fake) science has just led you off the deep end. Otherwise, you'd be the one with the evidence...
  9. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    Yes, you got one thing right. It is impossible to travel backward in time because of no parallel universe or multiverse. Most of your post is blabbering. Here is how someone travels forward in time using a "time machine." You can start at 4:00 if you don't have "time." ^_^
  10. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    Wrong. You believe in cave people as prehistoric. There were no such Flinstones types living in caves. It's another one of you evolutionary myths ^_^.
  11. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    You know that Greek and Roman gods were mythological as we all do. This is because of the apostles teaching the prehistoric people at the time they were myths. How else do you think we know this today?
  12. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    Creation scientists know, but can't participate in peer reviews anymore due to politics. It's the atheist scientists who do not know anything. They aren't just morons, but idiots.
  13. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    You definitely have to keep up.
  14. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    @Hans Blaster you don't know diddly squat. I already explained while all you have is BS, strawmen, red herrings, and more.
  15. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    Sure it is. Nothing else explains it. The Christians have evidence on their side and can answer what was there before the big bang with God and Kalam's Cosmological Argument. The atheist scientists have nothing, but fake hypotheses like multiverse. Haha. It is you who does not understand...
  16. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    Of course, our side has them because our side can explain them. Your side cannot explain what was there before the big bang nor explain how the universe got all its energy. Your science also violates the laws of physics. Thus, the newer scientific atheism has gone to multiverse as something...
  17. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    >>But it's a fact that the supernatural, that which is beyond nature, does not leave evidence of itself since by its own nature it cannot leave evidence. Hence why it's called the supernatural.<< That's just atheist bullpuckey. I can provide the Bible and its history, how science backs up the...
  18. jamesbond007

    What sins keep God from speaking to you?

    I'm not sure what sin you have, but wouldn't Satan be speaking with you to tempt you to sin some more? He's the "god of the world and prince of the power of the air" so definitely would have audio capability. Yet, through all this, God can speak to you if you listen and look at Christianity...
  19. jamesbond007

    What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

    I'm going by the Bible as science backs up the Bible.