Search results

Because your interpretation below is not true. The grammar in the Hebrew is the same in both clauses "month with (or in) month" and "Sabbath with (or in) Sabbath" In English we do not use that type of grammar, so it is rather difficult to translate. Luckily we have the same grammar being used...

Hard hearts . Case and point. It is quite plainly written in Deuteronomy 30 what’s on the heart so that all can see. Yet here we are.

You are sadly mistaken. It is the commandments and statutes which are written in the book of the law that is in Our hearts and mouths that we do them. Take note the judgements are not mention within the context of the passage sited. It is also worthy of mention that Romans 10:6-8 paraphrase...

I am sure we all know why most translations including the LXX translate that verse with the word month. It is because it is to be understood that way. Isa 66:23 (NET) From one month to the next and from one Sabbath to the next, all people will come to worship me,” says the LORD.

How is it one keeps the day holy? Worshipping in song, prayer, praise and doing our LORD'S bidding help in keeping the day holy. This we should do. And in doing we chance not defiling it by the unholiness of a self serving nature.. Though we are to keep everyday Holy and our lives through Christ...

No you are right. Neither you nor I define faith. God does and did through the Bible. And since you do not believe it or Him how do you define it? What ever you feel and think? And here you are not quoting verses and claiming the Bible isn't true in places. What does that make you? See my...

The folowing is the summary to the verses provided below it the original post. It is in respect to you mentioning the promised land. I get that you might not understand it. But to think it was posted in respect to the Passover I don't Hebrews 4-10 says, For we who have believed DO enter into...

There isn't anything funny. Sad really. We exchanged on 1 Cor 5 several times with you understanding that we agree on the sacrificial system not being on the same plan as the Passover. Then all of a sudden you go on a three paragraph stint thinking we don't.

Christians are people of faith. So?

So you are not a Christian?

Hence why it is a slap to God's face

No not at all. All that was mentioned except on 1Cor 5 was in respect to your mentioning the promised land. Funny how you did not note that. Take care.

No not at all. Because nowhere does it state that Christ is our Sabbath. But it does state that Christ our Passover was sacrificed for us. Do this OFTEN in remembrance of me is constant not once a year. So, it is now in respect to removing the leaven of sin from our church and presence to keep...

Wonderful, what was written to you has nothing to do with what they say. IT did not come from any of them WE are unleavened is PRESENT tense. And it is stated indicatively. So it is a fact, for Christ our Passover was sacrificed for us. Living in a constant state of unleavenedness through...

The purging out of the known sin, leaven of others in the church is the context. He is speaking to a people that are or are to be unleavened, sinless. These whom are sinless, unleavened are so because they partook of the Passover lamb and thereby are one with Christ and also partook of His death...

Can't be you or I huh? We are always right. 1Cor 5:4 In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, 1Cor 5:5 To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day...

Then according to your theology for the sake of the argument that you are putting forward it is not a sin to be a homosexual, lay with beasts, and not tell what we have witnessed in respect to a crime to name a few. And while we are at it, Matthew 5's context continues well into chapter 7. So...

Not according to Deut. 30:10-14

He in us, us in Him that the world might believe. However this has become subjective.

Your premise is a red herring. I really don't think you actually believe what you are saying yourself. You just think it is a good argument. Therefore, we don't see any reason to continue. Take care. We will not address this anymore unless you state something relevant.