Search results

This "19,000 denominations!" claim is blatantly false and a Roman Catholica talking point ironically. Really it's a talking point for those who seek authoritarian control to spread heresy such as this. Here's a great rebuttal of the claims that there's billions of Protestant denominations...

Rev, I don't know how many times I've had to say this in this forum. The creeds were not written to supplant or undermine the Bible. Creedal standards are not independent assertions of truth. They are derivative from and subordinate to the only source and standard of Christian truth: the...

Your first examples are bogus and have been refuted literally hundreds and thousands of times since when they were first trotted out. Also, they were in PANTHEONS of Gods. Polytheism. No Trinitarian is a polytheist. The Trinity is not pagan, that's nothing but a line stolen from a...

I think Romans 14:5 says it best: One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind.

You're reducing God to your own ideas of what is good. You are a created being and cannot judge the sovereign eternal God who is uncreated. No there is not an evil God and a Good God, that is Gnosticism. God is not only good, holy, love, etc. He is also just. As such, He must punish sin. Sin is...

It's amusing to me how some of the beliefs that CherubRam has espoused in these types of threads align with known heretical beliefs yet he accuses orthodox Christianity of "paganism."

Unfortunately for you the WTBS feeds you this heavily skewed and erroneous way of exegeting the Bible. In fact you can't even exegete it yourself as you need the Governing Body to tell you what it means. The Bible says that God appeared to people, but John 1:18 contradicts your idea that God...

I'm sorry but you have very little idea of what context means if you think that 27 chapters and the two sentences later you wish to rip out refutes in any way the theophanies of the Old Testament that soundly refute Unitarianism.

Sorry but I'm not sure you and I agree. I'm fully Trinitarian...

Question for you, Exodus 6:2-3 says that God appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as God Almighty. But the NT says that no man has seen the Father. So who did they see who was God Almighty who was not the Father? What you're doing is assuming Unitarianism and forcing it onto the text. Let's...

Yet an OT prophet predicted Jesus incarnation and described Him in terms of deity multiple times. I also know that you are working under an inaccurate definition of the Trinity fed to you by the WTBS. Examples: turn in your NWT to Psalm 102:25-27 and read this: “Of old You founded the earth...

Now read Romans 10:9 and Acts 4:11-12.

You're taking scripture out of context in your last part of your post. Whose name did the Early Church witness to people in? Jesus or God's? Where in the Bible does God command us to use His name or else we're not saved? YWH is the correct form. Jehovah is an error as I showed in my last post...

Not to mention when Jesus Himself said He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him....How do we honor the Father? By worshipping Him correct? We worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity;. Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance. For there is...

Again with this nonsense? Your interpretation here is entirely without merit as was shown in the entire thread you dedicated to this. You're inserting things into the texts which are not there. I AM (ego eimi in the Greek) is the imperfect form in Hebrew of "to be" it implies continual existence...