Search results

If you aren’t going to accept what words mean then why bother discussing anything. What did you find confusing about forming “man” from the dust of the ground? Besides it not fitting what you want to believe?

What makes you believe the moon is being discussed? Ancient mythology places Saturn in our sky ruling over a time of plenty... But that would require getting into a long discussion of Astronomy and why Saturn in the past when close to the sun emitted its own light...

“then the LORD God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature.” Genesis 2:7 There is not the slightest hint that man was anything other than man..... He didn’t form some microbe that became man.... but formed...

That’s exactly what the twin on the spaceship thinks.... that his time isn’t changing at all. The problem with this thinking is that we know his time is changing.... we are in no position to deny what we know.... Except Relativity demands that we are unable to say which object has the actual...

How long did any day last in a universe increasing in acceleration when God “stretched out the heavens”? If science continues to ignore the one and only science we have that deals with changes to time in a universe increasing in acceleration the age of the earth will continue to be vastly...

Long periods of Time in a universe increasing in acceleration is a rather subjective thing if we ignore Relativity and its consequences due to changes in velocity.... so instead of just giving lip service to it if we apply the one and only science we have that deals with changes to time and...

Or people simply ignore Relativity in a universe increasing in acceleration and keep thinking these processes occurred at the same rate they do today despite the one and only science we have that deals with time and length changes with increasing velocity.... This is why astronomers are...

Except it says Adam was formed directly from the dust.... as were the other animals directly formed..... This is why if you look at any evolutionary tree you will notice that there are only distinct lines and that every creature founds remains exactky the same for its entire existence. Every...

First off voting was not originally a constitutional right. It exists nowhere in the constitution as originally written. Amendments were passed So that one can simply not be discriminated against due to race, sex or religion if voting. But also one MUST be a citizen of the United States to...

First you need to ask why they ignore science.... You see we live in a universe increasing in acceleration when God “stretched out the heavens”. Yet the one and only science we have that deals with changes to time and lengths with changes in velocity is completely ignored in this universe...

Except days aren’t the same to God as they are to us... A day is to the Lord as a 1,000 years.... And when God “stretched out the heavens” those days that we count as 24 hours would have passed faster as lengths changed from our change in velocity through space. So that in what we consider a...

Can we really say it is 4+ billion years old? We live in a universe increasing in acceleration when God “stretched out the heavens”. So if we accept the only science that deals with time and length changes as velocity increases then these decay processes must have happened faster in the past...

when scientists talk about the age of the earth using radio metric dating they are doing so using a constant rate backwards.... The problem with this is that we live in a universe increasing in acceleration (God stretched out the heavens). We know from Relativity that increases in velocity...

Except all sexually reproducing life is found to be fully male and female from the getgo. You have asexually producing life to this day, so apparently the need to evolve sexual reproduction was not a survival issue since those that reproduce asexually outnumber the others billions to one...

What sequence? Tiktaalik for example evolved into nothing. It’s line ends on itself as do all of them. In each and every case this sequence is composed of missing common ancestors where the claimed evolution took place. Imaginary creature A became known creature B and also imaginary creature C...

These “experts” argued against Harlen Bretz for years because his ideas led to catastrophic beliefs instead of uniformitarianism. J Harlen Bretz - Wikipedia “Bretz published a paper in 1923, arguing that the Channeled Scablands in Eastern Washington were caused by massive flooding in the...

The discrepancy comes because no one wants to calculate time dilation in a universe increasing in acceleration when “God stretched out the heavens.” We know that acceleration causes clocks to slow. The reverse is that when the velocity was less, clocks and decay rates were necessarily faster...

It doesn’t matter which creature you look at. They one and all remain the same for their entire existence until they go extinct. It doesn’t matter if it is Tiktaalik or any of them. Notice that Tiktaalik didn’t evolve into anything. It’s line ends on itself. Instead in each and every case it...

From ignoring reality and accepting theory over it..... it's why they complain about discussing reality.... Despite the fact that modern biology relies on the fact that no new organs will develop, that during heart surgery say, they can expect the same thing time after time after time..... and...

If you count using incorrect facts as addressing them, then I guess I would have to say no.... How about it since the seemingly unlimited variation has only addressed itself in a very limited subset.... Then why keep ignoring that variation that leads to the variation being the same species...