Search results

The Creation Account is not a myth! I take the creation account as actual history.

Have you actually witnessed a transitional type happen? Have you actually seen one of those ancestoral types undergoing change?

Oh and Scientific American is faultless and without bias...Please!!! Look who is quote-mining now?

Yeah, well consider what Hitler and his Nazis did to the youth of Germany! There is more than enough proof. And how many schools have you visited in the last, say, 30 years?

Because it is so. The integrity of OT maintains it. And it speaks for itself.

So the Book of Hebrews is non-canonical...is it? The Author of Hebrews is uncertain...some say Paul and some say Barnabas, and others say that one of Paul's companions. I, generally, consider Paul to be the author but some do believe it is Barnabas. In The Acts of the Apostles, Barnabas is...

You definitely are totally incorrect. I suggest you need to go back to seminary to learn the Difference between Eschatology and Plenary Inspiration. You are wrong. Fundamentalist believe that. Not Dispensationalists. And I am not Dispensationalist.

Evidence does not prove evolution. It is your presupposition that makes you say that. It is the way you interpret the evidence that leads you to that conclusion. Just cut your toe off and see how it affects your balance. That is a medical fact.

Your Apostolic tradition is a tradition founded on the Papacy. Peter was not the first Pope and nor was Clement. That so-called apostolic tradition, you claim, is based on the Mysteries of the Babylonian religion (Pagan). It came from Babylon, went via Troy, and became the Pagan Mysteries of...

Which proves that you are inconsistent. You waver between two opposite diametrically opposed systems....like every wave of the sea blown by different winds...this way and that. And Scripture mentions those like you.

Science is empirical - if you know what that means. Evolution is not observable therefore it is not empirical. Your reasoning is false because you say that science works by inductive logic. Do you know what the word INDUCTIVE means? And who knows what logic you mean?

Well, maybe the folllwing quote will help you: I am convinced that the battle for humankind's future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly perceive their role as the proselytizers of a new faith. “Religious Humanism is not merely an armchair religion...

So again you duck and weave. Why should I believe Hovind? But the point was Bounoure was a theistic evolutionist. And that is the point you have failed to understand. And as I said that article was so quoted in The Advocate. Take your issue to The Advocate.

Really that seems to be your standard quote - like an old fashioned rubber stamp. Are you trying to tell me what do? What arrogance! Let me pursue it. The Advocate quoted it so maybe you should make your claim to the The Advocate to retract it. Bounoure certainly didn’t. So the ball is in your...

Yes maybe Speedwell would like to accompany me to a slaughter house. You'll see the many thousand of cattle, sheep and goats per day just before they receive the bolt - they realise their end is nigh.

But to your questions. I think many people would see God as having even greater creative power if the created a Universe in which human beings arise by "natural" means. In this respect, I don't think that the theory of evolution even remotely touches on the matter of what the Universe needs to...

Maybe I should quote an earlier post in this thread....It is all there for everyone to see. An no I'm not speculating. But just maybe you have selected memory.

Oh yes you are definitely right at about "decieved teaching the decieved!" BUT, that certainly doesn't make it right. Because: *[[Mat 7:13]] KJV* Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:

How about this quote: The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory - is it a science or a faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation - both...

Amen Brother.