Search results

  1. Y

    If evolution were wrong, it means ...

    Baramins, are the kinds of creatures God created. All attempts at taxonomy are purely hypothetical and man-made, Baraminolgy however is the closest model, or closest ranking system as to what Genesis says. Transitional? your statement is starting at the assumption these transitional fossils...
  2. Y

    What is a "kind"?

    The Baramins are very easy to understand: Man (different ethnicities/races) Canidae (dogs, wolves, foxes etc) Crocodilia (crocodiles, alligators etc) Equidae (Horses, Zebras etc) Birds and fish are pretty much self explanatory as are trees/plants. I've written a lot on this topic, if i...
  3. Y

    Missing link was a lie

    I believe he said evolutionists make up data they present in their papers. You are playing with words here, and swapping evolutionists with scientists. Not all scientists agree with evolution. And since i've just exposed you as swapping words (evolutionist trickery) i believe that makes you...
  4. Y

    Can an Evangelical Christian Accept Evolution?

    Well why should anyone trust what an evolutionist says? The theory of evolution is filled with nothing but deceit, fraud and hoaxes. Here is a small list of evolutionist fraud: Piltdown Man Nebraska Man Southwest Colorado Man Orce Man Java Man Flipperpithecus Archaeoraptor Haeckel's...
  5. Y

    Can an Evangelical Christian Accept Evolution?

    Piltdown Man Nebraska Man Southwest Colorado Man Orce Man Java Man Flipperpithecus Archaeoraptor Haeckel's Drawings and that's only the most well known ones.
  6. Y

    Can an Evangelical Christian Accept Evolution?

    Cranial Capacity: Man 1200-1700cc Gorilla 340-752cc Orangutan 275-500cc Chimpanzees 270-500cc As you can see, apes lack cranial capacity to man, look at the huge gap in figures. Knowing this, evolutionists created frauds of 'missing links' for years trying to get figures to close this...
  7. Y

    How can there be coal beds under the sea?

    I would say coal beds are the result of plant debris catastrophically buried by the deluge, and that they can be found anywhere.
  8. Y

    Missing link was a lie

    2009/2010 polls have proven the vast majority of people want other theories alongside the theory of evolution to be taught in schools. The average person on the street accepts evolution as a theory, nothing more, they don't accept it as fact. The fact remains, support for creationism/ID is...
  9. Y

    Missing link was a lie

    I don't fully understand what you mean by this. Do you believe animals have changed (mutated, evolved) in their phenotype?
  10. Y

    Missing link was a lie

    Interesting article. More and more people everyday are leaving the theory of evolution and embracing ID or creationism. Deep down all evolutionists know their belief is nothing but a lie and hoax.
  11. Y

    Evolutionary debate

    You clearly have not read into this very well. Lenski has hidden tuns of data from the public on his apparent experiments. You don't have to look far, to find in Lenski's own words: In three places in our paper, we did say 'data not shown', which is common in scientific papers. Yet it was...
  12. Y

    Evolutionary debate

    Is it not evolutionists who say: ''99.9% of humans are DNA identical'' ''Humans share 97% DNA with Chimps'' ''We all bleed red'' Yet now you guys are saying Humans are totally different to each other? :confused:
  13. Y

    Evolutionary debate

    Lenski has refused to release details on his 'bacteria mutation' to public, and his peer-reviewed paper (2008) has also been rejected, or atleast questioned because of it's flaws. Can't (yet) paste links showing where all this is listed. However looking up the net, ''Flaws in Richard Lenski...
  14. Y

    Evolutionary debate

    What about ERV's is 'evidence' for the theory of evolution? From what i've read, most Intelligent Design advocates are using ERV's for their evidence, not evolutionists.
  15. Y

    Evolutionary debate

    ''A gradual process in which something changes into a different form.'' Or ''Change in the genetic composition of a population during successive generations.'' Niether have been observed.
  16. Y

    Evolutionary debate

    I'm a biologist, and i don't believe in evolution. I'm new here, but i would suggest you evolutionists learn how to debate instead of resorting to your usual logical fallacies. I also started a thread, inviting any evolutionist to debate me on biology (or another scientific area). There is...