Search results

7? I remember the days when there was one! :D Does this forum really need more mods? Or you playing Gerry?

Yes it does, but it doesn't say to try to disprove Gods account of his creation of man, he was explicit when he said he CREATED man in a day.

Lewis, when evolution has been proven 100%, you'll have my attention. :)

Nothing else that man can offer can explain it, besides it's no secret how close a lot of species DNA is. That doesn't prove anything.

Best explaination? I don't need no best explaination, all I need is the truth, and evolution does not provide enough answers for me consider it truth.

For me to do that, and believe that means I have to question Gods account of Genesis, and with the incompleteness of evolution, I have no desire. As a Christian I look forward to meeting my savior, I really have no interest in debating speculation. :) Goodnight.

You guys will not listen, so I will say good night. :) If you do decide to listen, Praise the Lord. Remember, the more important thing is your salvation, arguing over incomplete data is really a waste of time.

Those are the words of an unbeliever, Im sorry you believe we evolved from a group of cells, your imperfect evolution theory has much missing data, and always will, you really believe the missing link will be found? Do you think the missing transitional fossils will surface? Both concepts are...

What truth? It is still a theory, it will not be proven satisfactorily in our life time, the answers will be answered with 100% accuracy by God himself. The people who are fooled into believing we evolved are being blinded by the devil, and therefore causing them to question the bible.

Anyone who believes Jesus died for your sins, is a Christian, arguing over things that will never be proven or do not fit the written word is dangerous as it creates doubt and prevents one from knowing who God really is. If God says he created Man right then and there, then as a Christian we...

Oh Im sorry, I see by your registration date you are not a newbie, but I have explained this to no end. Any deviation from the written word is not correct, like npetreley said, you must shove evolution into Gods account of creation with a crowbar, and even then it doesn't fit. ;)m

What do you believe? Yes there is only one way way to interpret Genesis and that is literal, do you have an alternative way to interpret Genesis? How do you derive evolution from Genesis? Why must everyone stray from the written word? And no I don't believe we've met, I don't get on much...

There is only one way to interpret Genesis, I have gone over this extensively in the past, the woman was made as the mans helpmeet, and while adam was sleeping God took one of adams ribs to compliment the 2 and join them as one anothers mate. You cannot specualate on Genesis, it is clear how...

You have plenty of time my man!

ooops sorry, I was born and raised Catholic, so my take on it can be seen from a Catholic persons point of view, however I do not participate in the Catholic church anymore. :)

I have been following that thread over in Apologetics and I refrained from answering. Here I will point out that any label of feminism to God is dangerous and a probable blasphemous reduction of Gods image of Masculinity and authority. We are not too small, too finite to understand Gods...

I am Laurie

Excellent observation davo! Now lets clear up the faulty Transmillenium speculation theory.

Jumping to conclusions on the words literal meaning, your time frame is off.

Nancy, salvation will be complete when Christ returns for his bride and claims his Kingdom, I hope that clears thing up a little.