Search results

I'm pretty sure there was one over at IIDB a couple months ago. He seemed pretty much exactly like a creationist in regards to tactics and such.

So if you take the OP to be talking strictly of Darwinian evolution then there were a lot of atheists that didn't "believe in" it.

Well didn't Communist Russia embrace Lamarckian Evolution?

Hey what about that family in America (I think) who have extremely dense bones?

Reminds me of the interview with Richard Feynman in The Pleasure of Finding Things Out. I can't post links apparently, so search for it on youtube and someone else post it. I think it's called Ode to the Flower.

So you finally admit it is unfalsifiable?

I honestly didn't think Dad could be challenged for the throne. How wrong I was.

That's why I was trying to bring it up again.

What happened to this?

Wolf, you seem to be mixing falsified and falsifiable in several sentences. Do you understand they are not the same?

What does the Big Bang have to do with "Evolutionist" PRATTs?

Not really. Students should be taught to be curious and question things and then they will learn about evolution anyway.

All I meant was that some Christians accept micro but not macro. With the car analogy it becomes evident that they are the same.

This is just rubbish right here.

Well you only have to accept micro evolution for the car analogy to be apt.

But, Evolution is falsifiable.