Search results

Choice? If evolution is true then what is choice? Where did choice come from? FoeHammer.

... then isn’t "medical science" anti-evolution since it attempts to understand and treat that which the mindless, purposeless, process of evolution produces? Who decides whether a genetic mutation is beneficial or harmful? And what do they base that decision on? Why fight disease? Why...

Was the first life-form asexual or sexual? FoeHammer.

So why do you accept evolution? FoeHammer.

It is not the same thing for, what should be, obvious reasons... ask a fellow evo. FoeHammer.

What circumstance caused an asexual organism to become a sexual organism? FoeHammer.

Take a look at their FAQs. If you don't see the bias then I can't help you. FoeHammer.

I have an allotment and grow fruit and vegetables. So yes. And So what? FoeHammer.

Yes. FoeHammer.

Within this forum why can't "they... deliver the original evidence"? Because they cannot even if they had any that's why. Which is what I have been saying. All they have are links to ..... Surely you must know the rest by now? Are you being deliberately obtuse? How much and what "evidence" for...

What claims would these be? Ditto. FoeHammer.

No. FoeHammer.

Have them interpreted for me by a scientist who shares my own bias of course.:P Something like that. I am pointing out that although there are claims in this forum of a mountain of "evidence" for evolution by evolutionists they have nothing of the sort, all they have are numerous links to...

Nope, talkorigins (wash my mouth) is not bias free and doesn't share my own. FoeHammer.

They can't! Chemical or biological evolution, the point is the same. FoeHammer.

What evidence? For those who claim to have evidence. Try this, see if any of you can grasp it..... finally. You have three fossils, fossil 1 is, say, 150 million years old, fossil 2 is 100 myo and fossil 3 is 50 myo. You write a paper declaring that, in your opinion, (as an evolutionist) and...

No! You don't know, you might believe that you know but that isn't quite the same thing is it? What do you know of these things that you have observed, repeated, tested and demonstrated? How much do you know based upon your own investigation of actual physical evidence? How many scientific...

So what is the alternative to "a short magical intermezzo'' as you put it? In order that you deride/dismiss my belief in the Genesis account the origin of man you must know of a better explanation... so let's have it? The chemicals that gave rise to the first ?-forms came from where? FoeHammer.

How so? Don't let the details get in the way will you? We're not talking about "evidence" we are talking about interpretations of "evidence". :doh: Then don't use "that kind of logic". FoeHammer.

I see no conflict between elijah115 and myself. I believe that God formed man of the dust of the ground and God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life. You believe we came from rocks... How? Surely the difference isn't so subtle that you couldn't help but miss it. FoeHammer.