Search results

present the pervasive evidence 1.] that creation has happened in real world, real-life conditions and 2.] evidence that it continues to exist today both as predicted by the bible. Otherwise you have no defense and the argument remains very much alive. when i see your evidence i will know what...

if i were to post a book that says evolution happened would that be good enough? isnt that what creationists do? the only evidence there is for creation is an old book that says it happened. it is amusing to watch some christians reject evolution because we dont have all the answers yet but they...

well then you have a problem because literal resurrection is a fable. http://www.religioustolerance.org/resurrec5.htm

the battle for the mind of man. religion after all is a battle for the mind of man.

all that is required for ignorance to win is for wise men(women) to say nothing. i think those who can help make sure we dont fall into the trap of religious domination in this country have a duty to do so. religious superstition will eventually be educated out of most people but without...

did you miss this part? Second, the theory became an issue (quite coincidentally) just when creationism reached its acme of thankfully temporary influence. Creationists, with their usual skill in the art of phony rhetoric, cynically distorted punctuated equilibrium for their own ends, claiming...

Punctuated equilibrium provoked a major brouhaha, still continuing, but now in much more productive directions. With my vicennial perspective, I can identify both bad and good in the extensive debate. Three points stand out on the negative side. First, simple misunderstanding of basic content...

if GOD created sex only for the purpose of procreation why doesnt a woman get pregnant everytime she has sex?