Search results

Not sure what is meant by the label 'creationist', but in any case if evolutionary philosophy was discarded, science would progress uninhibited by arbitrary evolutionary constraints; thus the possibility that life is what it so evidently seems to be would be considered. Science would not come to...

wonderful, you've hit the nail on the head, it is important to note that modern man resents being awakened from his blissful stupor. Hence he mocks, distorts, and hates whatever lies beyond his own worldview. In a state of spiritual death, his life is defined by the biological life of his body...

No one is trying to disprove evolution, the evidence put forward by its apologists is unconvincing and cannot be taken seriously .The so called evidence intermittently released for public consumption is self serving and always associated with confirmation of the only theory that the evolutionary...

Evolution is a scientific concept, albeit a philosophical necessity since its apologists claim that major transformations could occur in very small steps by purely natural means, such that time, chance and differential survival could take the place of a miracle. As a scientific theory it is as...

micro to macro is nothing more than an arbitrary philosophical principle, it tells us nothing about how macroevolution can occur. As defined microevolution is fine, but does it tell us anything about the processes responsible for creating birds, insects or trees. The first step toward speciation...

What evidence ? I have yet to read un unbiased dissertation that unequivocably proves the bizarre hypothesis...namely--soup begat life begat man. On the contrary, today more so than in Darwins time, knowing what we know about the complexity of life the universe and the whole damn thing; it...

Oh dear

say what ? the use of arbitrary terms dressed up to appear vaguely descriptive and yet mean nothing , seems to be the preferred method of defence employed by evolutionism

indeed, only a fool would feed his child foodstuffs laced with synthetic hormones. Beware of Greeks bearing misinformation

Scientific knowledge relating to the wonders of biology, is knowledge par excellence insofar as it is actually knowledge of nature. Evolutionary dogma is rather more complex than of a single scientific fact or hypothesis. It is a belief involving many spheres of thought and by no means just science.

Surely you cannot be serious, I suspect you have no idea how science works,more importantly you have no idea how evolutionary philosophy works.It is pointless engaging a self proclaimed evolutionist in discussion about whether the TOE is true. The reply is likely to be that the theory is the...

If science is to have any explanation for biological complexity, it has to make do with the only alternative it has at its disposal, namely the philosophy of natural selection. This view or theory can never be allowed to be considered doubtful since there is no plausible naturalistic...

the evolutionist version of life is hilarious

Genetics, heredity,variation of inherited characteristics etc.are bona fide scientific disciplines; they can be studied and their findings utilised just as the properties of matter are. Such disciplines are based on facts; evolutionary constructs are based on the faith of philosophical naturalism.

Darwin On Trial "P.E.Johnson" should be read in conjunction with any of the myriad of works suggested thus far.The author argues eloquently and brilliantly that the TOE is not at all a fact, but indeed a philosophy.

They boast of their wisdom, but they have made fools of themselves, exchanging the glory of the immortal God for an image shaped like mortal man, even for images like birds, beasts, and archaeoptreryx "They have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and have offered reverence and worship to...

"A bit of science distances one from God, but much science nears one to Him." —Louis Pasteur (1822-1895), French scientist, developer of pasteurization process for milk and vaccines for anthrax, chicken cholera and rabies, dean of the faculty of sciences at Lille University. I suggest you study...

Wishful thinking at best,there is alot of philosophy packed in the phrase "then we both inherited that sequence from a common ancestor". Because you take for granted that relationship is equivalent to common ancestry,you assume that the genetic properties confirm the "fact of evolution" by...