• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

New GOP efforts to make it harder to vote

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
5,198
4,380
28
Seattle
✟230,727.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
And now you're insinuating that black people couldn't make an intelligent choice when they cast their vote. "They got duped" is how you put it. If they're duped so easily, then please don't complain about the ficticious idea that Conservatives are making it harder for them to vote. They're not. They simply understand that black people are just as intelligent as white people. They can vote for the people they want, and they can get a photo ID to enable them to do so.
Please stop half reading. Here is what I wrote, "They got duped. A lot of MAGA got duped. Trump has been a lifelong con. Yet, this today"

I provided that particular article because you brought up the increase of blacks voting for Trump.

Now, do you want to see an article of MAGA saying they got duped? Trump is a con man.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
45,467
14,025
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟1,025,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Attacking the messenger instead of refuting the argument shows the weakness of your position.
Who is the messenger?

If my sources are as incredible as you claim, you could easily refute them.

The fact that you haven't is strong evidence that you're unable, or unwilling.

Let me guess: you'll refute them in two weeks.
I'm not interested in spending my time refuting numerous falsehoods.
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
8,599
5,960
NW
✟323,221.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
  • Useful
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
8,599
5,960
NW
✟323,221.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I still have to scratch my head. Why is the left so opposed to strengthening vote security? I mean what is rhe real reason?
Why is the right thing to prevent legal voters from voting while pretending it's for security? Were they unhappy with the 2024 results?
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
45,467
14,025
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟1,025,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The author of the article I linked.
Well, they aren't even here.

That's the whole point of a discussion forum! You might ask yourself why you're even here.
Discussion forums aren't for spreading falsehoods for others to refute. Some people may feel entertained by doing that.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
45,467
14,025
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟1,025,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Why is the right thing to prevent legal voters from voting while pretending it's for security? Were they unhappy with the 2024 results?
Is this the part where we're supposed to correct you about who it is to prevent from voting? Your question comes across as dishonest and does not reflect a genuine desire to understand the viewpoint of others. If you could simply ask who exactly voter security is meant to black from voting rather than asking if it's the right thing to prevent legal voters from voting and saying that we're just pretending it's for security, then an honest debate could be had at that point.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,693
15,599
Earth
✟311,835.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I still have to scratch my head. Why is the left so opposed to strengthening vote security? I mean what is rhe real reason?
How tight do we need it to be?

That’s a question that never asked, but our good friends on the Right seem to think that it’s so loose that any rando can waltz into the country and affect the outcomes of Elections that might alter direction of our country.

If they show that this happens beyond the odd-block of votes in this (or that precinct), or that an outcome has been changed by such illegal-tallies, then I would agree with them and call for a tighter level of voting security; but they ain’t, and I don’t.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,693
15,599
Earth
✟311,835.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Why is the right thing to prevent legal voters from voting while pretending it's for security? Were they unhappy with the 2024 results?
The results of 2024 will never be repeated in the foreseeable future.
Trump was an aberration, he galvanized voters, he’s not going to run in 2028; the rest of MAGA “leaders” won’t get the Red out so good on Election Day…limiting “who votes” is their only move.
“The Smart Move”

No wonder the right jettisoned the “states’ rights!” principle so quickly; and why (many) OG Conservatives gnash their teeth.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,693
15,599
Earth
✟311,835.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Wow, they really buried the lede on this one
Of the roughly 6,600 who were incorrectly registered to vote, about 400 cast ballots in at least one election. None of those votes appeared to influence the contests’ outcomes, Sherrill said.
99.93% of iIllegal Voters Stopped Before They Could Try to Return a Ballot! would’ve been too close to the truth.

i missed where your article stated that this one election was swayed by these “400” votes; do we know what elections were affected?
New Jersey has about 9,500,000 people and a voter turnout of about 4,400,000…if this was a statewide election then we might guess that the “400” weren’t necessarily “clustered” and didn’t matter much.

“99.93” isn’t tight enough?
Oddly enough 99.93% is slightly more than the number of non-trans people but that gets plenty of traction, too!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,638
1,420
73
Sebring, FL
✟953,893.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
This is not stating that a photo id should not be required. It is speaking of the requirements for photo id being made more difficult, such as the second item you highlighted.

Texas used to allow university id as a form of ID. Many college students are eligible to vote but may not have a drivers license, passport or state id. Prior to the gutting of the voting rights act they were able to use student id's for identification but afterward they eliminated that along with anything that would help students or minorities, who are seen as more liberal voters including removing polling places off campus when many students don't drive.


Critics See Efforts by Counties and Towns to Purge Minority Voters From Rolls​



SPARTA, Ga. — When the deputy sheriff’s patrol cruiser pulled up beside him as he walked down Broad Street at sunset last August, Martee Flournoy, a 32-year-old black man, was both confused and rattled. He had reason: In this corner of rural Georgia, African-Americans are arrested at a rate far higher than that of whites.

But the deputy had not come to arrest Mr. Flournoy. Rather, he had come to challenge Mr. Flournoy’s right to vote.

The majority-white Hancock County Board of Elections and Registration was systematically questioning the registrations of more than 180 black Sparta citizens — a fifth of the city’s registered voters — by dispatching deputies with summonses commanding them to appear in person to prove their residence or lose their voting rights. “When I read that letter, I was kind of nervous,” Mr. Flournoy said in an interview. “I didn’t know what to do.”

Alabama moved last year to close 31 driver’s license offices, almost all in rural areas with large African-American populations, as a cost-saving measure. After lawsuit threats and complaints that the closings would severely curtail local voter registration, the state chose to open the offices at least one day a month. Gov. Robert J. Bentley, a Republican, has strongly denied that the closings were racially motivated.

More@ giftlink above

90-Year Old Grandmother of PA Borough President Can’t Vote Under New GOP Photo ID Law





Debunking the evidence for election fraud cases​




Election Fraud Falsehoods Are Spreading. Here’s What to Watch For.​


Thanks for this information. I lived in Georgia for twenty years and Georgia politics can get pretty rough. I once saw a segment on TV news on a school board meeting. Members of the school board were trying to call an election to get rid of school board members who did not vote with the majority, who kept disagreeing with the majority of the Board. They opened it up to public discussion. A citizen comes up and says, "This is illegal!" The Chairman interrupted him and said, "Shut up and sit down!"
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
8,599
5,960
NW
✟323,221.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
49,323
51,625
Los Angeles Area
✟1,148,502.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Federal government is providing faulty information about who is a citizen.​

Texas confirms some flagged as potential noncitizens on voter rolls had provided DPS proof of citizenship

Although it’s not clear how many U.S. citizens were wrongly flagged, the state told county election officials to immediately reinstate some that had been removed from the voter roll.


The voters were flagged after the state checked its voter roll through a federal program called Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, used to verify the citizenship of people registered to vote.

Adkins said the state is still working through the data and that she couldn’t yet say how many of the 2,724 people had provided proof of citizenship to DPS and should thus be reinstated if they were already removed from the voter roll. She characterized SAVE as having “some inaccurate information” but added that “most of the data that we got out of SAVE was consistent with what DPS had.”

“Counties are following appropriate list maintenance procedures under Texas law, and will ensure eligible voters whose registrations were cancelled are reinstated, and that only U.S. citizens remain on the voter rolls,” Miles said in an emailed statement.

[I'm a little worried that these list maintenance procedures are appropriate, given that they were erroneous and countermanded.]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dale
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
30,286
9,413
66
✟478,635.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
How tight do we need it to be?

That’s a question that never asked, but our good friends on the Right seem to think that it’s so loose that any rando can waltz into the country and affect the outcomes of Elections that might alter direction of our country.

If they show that this happens beyond the odd-block of votes in this (or that precinct), or that an outcome has been changed by such illegal-tallies, then I would agree with them and call for a tighter level of voting security; but they ain’t, and I don’t.
The truth is Pommer its so lose that any rando can do that. We don't have any government organizations pouring over the voter roles every election to make sure every vote was a legal vote. We just don't. That would be a HUGE task and take a huge agency to do that. With as many states as there are which allows anyone, legal or not to get a valid state ID its not tough for them to vote. We've been over this a lot.

How much security is needed? More than we have. A simple ID that says you are a legal voter and a citizen of this country is certainly not too much to ask. We aren't asking for armed guards and security lines. Just an ID. We require IDs for everything. Voting is far more impact full upon all of us than the ability to access government programs.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
45,467
14,025
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟1,025,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The results of 2024 will never be repeated in the foreseeable future.
Trump was an aberration, he galvanized voters, he’s not going to run in 2028; the rest of MAGA “leaders” won’t get the Red out so good on Election Day…limiting “who votes” is their only move.
“The Smart Move”

No wonder the right jettisoned the “states’ rights!” principle so quickly; and why (many) OG Conservatives gnash their teeth.
People were claiming that during Trump's first 4 years. The Democrats got cocky as a result and thought Kamala was going to defeat him the second time around. Result: Trump's second term in office.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,693
15,599
Earth
✟311,835.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
People were claiming that during Trump's first 4 years. The Democrats got cocky as a result and thought Kamala was going to defeat him the second time around. Result: Trump's second term in office.
Yes, indeed Trump beat every woman whom he ran against.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
45,467
14,025
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟1,025,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

JSRG

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2019
2,701
1,724
Midwest
✟272,753.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
People were claiming that during Trump's first 4 years. The Democrats got cocky as a result and thought Kamala was going to defeat him the second time around. Result: Trump's second term in office.
The Democrats didn't choose Kamala because they got "cocky"... they chose her because thanks to Biden's insistence on running for re-election only to drop out a month before the convention, they needed to choose a new candidate in a real hurry that they could rally the party around, because there was no time to do new primaries and there were major risks if they tried to do it the old style way of the candidates trying to persuade the delegates at the convention (what happens if they can't agree on someone in time?). If you need to quickly find a replacement presidential candidate, the most logical choice in such a case would be to choose whoever was Vice President at the time, which was Harris.

Obviously, that didn't end up working out. But I still think that--with the information available to them at the time--this decision made the most sense. It certainly wasn't because they got "cocky", it was because Biden put them in a bad situation and choosing Harris was perceived, for valid reasons, to be the least bad option available to them at that point.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
45,467
14,025
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟1,025,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The Democrats didn't choose Kamala because they got "cocky"... they chose her because thanks to Biden's insistence on running for re-election only to drop out a month before the convention, they needed to choose a new candidate in a real hurry that they could rally the party around, because there was no time to do new primaries and there were major risks if they tried to do it the old style way of the candidates trying to persuade the delegates at the convention (what happens if they can't agree on someone in time?). If you need to quickly find a replacement presidential candidate, the most logical choice in such a case would be to choose whoever was Vice President at the time, which was Harris.

Obviously, that didn't end up working out. But I still think that--with the information available to them at the time--this decision made the most sense. It certainly wasn't because they got "cocky", it was because Biden put them in a bad situation and choosing Harris was perceived, for valid reasons, to be the least bad option available to them at that point.
What I mean by "cocky" is that they tried with Hillary and that didn't work, and then they seemed to think that Trump was so easy to beat the second time around because of the way they kept trying to malign him during the Biden years, so they chose another woman, and it was the woman that had the least likability, and was the first to drop out of the primary to run as a Democrat for the presidential election when Biden won. That's how bad she was, and she continued proving how bad she was as vice president. Yet she was the best they could come up with when Biden finally was talked into withdrawing from the race.
I hope they do something similar in 2028. Maybe they'll even go with one of those extremist socialist types. That would be about as cocky as can be.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,780
7,886
62
Montgomery
✟310,339.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What I mean by "cocky" is that they tried with Hillary and that didn't work, and then they seemed to think that Trump was so easy to beat the second time around because of the way they kept trying to malign him during the Biden years, so they chose another woman, and it was the woman that had the least likability, and was the first to drop out of the primary to run as a Democrat for the presidential election when Biden won. That's how bad she was, and she continued proving how bad she was as vice president. Yet she was the best they could come up with when Biden finally was talked into withdrawing from the race.
I hope they do something similar in 2028. Maybe they'll even go with one of those extremist socialist types. That would be about as cocky as can be.
AOC 2028
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aldebaran
Upvote 0