• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Mayor Mamdani advances plans for cheaper government-run grocery stores in NYC

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
14,702
6,325
Minnesota
✟399,677.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,660
15,584
Earth
✟311,214.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
"When you are speaking about a dense neighborhood, there is more than enough market for both existing grocers, as well as one city-run grocery store."
Plans call for the first store to open by the end of 2027.
The end of 2027 for the first store? Big to promise, slow to deliver.
You’re not in favor of this store but want it to come about even faster?

”…and the portions are so small!”
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
14,702
6,325
Minnesota
✟399,677.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
You’re not in favor of this store but want it to come about even faster?

”…and the portions are so small!”
I think they are delaying the inevitable. The quicker people see the results of these policies the better for the people. They can elect someone who will get the potholes fixed and the garbage collected on time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunny

CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN

My dad died 1/12/2023. I'm still devastated.
Jul 1, 2007
18,535
5,831
Native Land
✟440,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
"When you are speaking about a dense neighborhood, there is more than enough market for both existing grocers, as well as one city-run grocery store."
Plans call for the first store to open by the end of 2027.
The end of 2027 for the first store? Big to promise, slow to deliver.

Mayor Mamdani is trying to do a good, and you're complaining. I think the rich people and religious should be helping. I pay taxes, I believe the government can afford to give us free fruits and vegetables, instead of wasting it invasions on other counties, for no reasons.​

 
Upvote 0

Servus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
32,617
16,479
Washington
✟1,186,716.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Mayor Mamdani is trying to do a good, and you're complaining. I think the rich people and religious should be helping. I pay taxes, I believe the government can afford to give us free fruits and vegetables, instead of wasting it invasions on other counties, for no reasons.​

WIC, SNAP, thousands of food banks etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunny

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,454
10,379
66
Martinez
✟1,319,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
WIC, SNAP, thousands of food banks etc.
Are you aware of the Trump administration cuts?

-USDA (Local Food Grants - LFPA / LFS): 100% cut ($1.08 billion eliminated).
-USDA (WIC Vouchers): 60% to 75% cut.
-USDA (SNAP / Food Stamps): 20% cut ($187 billion over 10 years, knocking ~4.5 million off coverage).
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,454
10,379
66
Martinez
✟1,319,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,454
10,379
66
Martinez
✟1,319,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think they are delaying the inevitable. The quicker people see the results of these policies the better for the people. They can elect someone who will get the potholes fixed and the garbage collected on time.
I believe feeding the labor force and their families is more of a priority.
 
Upvote 0

Servus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
32,617
16,479
Washington
✟1,186,716.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Are you aware of the Trump administration cuts?

-USDA (Local Food Grants - LFPA / LFS): 100% cut ($1.08 billion eliminated).
-USDA (WIC Vouchers): 60% to 75% cut.
-USDA (SNAP / Food Stamps): 20% cut ($187 billion over 10 years, knocking ~4.5 million off coverage).
WIC and SNAP are still available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunny

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
31,354
17,798
Here
✟1,646,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Mayor Mamdani is trying to do a good, and you're complaining. I think the rich people and religious should be helping. I pay taxes, I believe the government can afford to give us free fruits and vegetables, instead of wasting it invasions on other counties, for no reasons.​


That would be a red herring as it's not a question "what government could technically afford to do", it's about the scope of what government is supposed to do.

The government (if not constrained by purpose-driven rules) could also take the military budget, and repurpose it for a "new Corvette give-away raffle for 15 million lucky citizens" -- but that's not their job, providing national defense is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunny

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,454
10,379
66
Martinez
✟1,319,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Are recipients getting less?
I would say a 100% cut qualifies as recipients receiving less in one program. Overall, these policy changes represent a severe combination of both, stripping millions of individuals off program rolls and directly reducing the physical supply of food.
 
Upvote 0

Servus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
32,617
16,479
Washington
✟1,186,716.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I would say a 100% cut qualifies as recipients receiving less in one program. Overall, these policy changes represent a severe combination of both, stripping millions of individuals off program rolls and directly reducing the physical supply of food.
A million children are now getting nothing.
So it's not that recipients are getting less, but rather that there are less recipients. And apparently that's because there are tighter requirements. Which were put into place because the system was being exploited. People who could work, were not working in lieu of subsisting off tax payer funds. In other words it's no longer being given to those who don't really need it.

But of course there are those who want a free-for-all society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunny

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
49,247
51,565
Los Angeles Area
✟1,147,154.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
So it's not that recipients are getting less
No, that's happening as well.

AI Overview (Google "are snap recipients getting less")

Yes, millions of SNAP recipients are receiving less assistance or have lost benefits entirely. Following the enactment of the federal legislation known as H.R. 1 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act), stricter work requirements, raised age limits for those rules, and reduced household deductions (such as disallowing internet utility expenses) have led to a sharp drop in total enrollment and lower individual monthly amounts.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Impact on Recipients
  • Reduced Individual Amounts: Remaining eligible households often receive less money each month due to recalculated benefit formulas and removed utility deductions. [1, 2]
 
Upvote 0

Servus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
32,617
16,479
Washington
✟1,186,716.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No, that's happening as well.

AI Overview (Google "are snap recipients getting less")

Yes, millions of SNAP recipients are receiving less assistance or have lost benefits entirely. Following the enactment of the federal legislation known as H.R. 1 (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act), stricter work requirements, raised age limits for those rules, and reduced household deductions (such as disallowing internet utility expenses) have led to a sharp drop in total enrollment and lower individual monthly amounts.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Impact on Recipients
  • Reduced Individual Amounts: Remaining eligible households often receive less money each month due to recalculated benefit formulas and removed utility deductions. [1, 2]
Is that less for those who need less, or less for those who need more?