• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

NYT: Trump Administration Admits Canceling Grants to States That Did Not Vote for Him

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
49,323
51,625
Los Angeles Area
✟1,148,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Stolen from Daisy Day, as I think this is the bigger story from her post.

NYT: Trump Administration Admits Canceling Grants to States That Did Not Vote for Him


Federal officials said in court documents that they halted billions of dollars in funding for energy projects to states “based solely” on whether they backed President Trump in the 2024 election.

When the Trump administration canceled more than $7.5 billion in Biden-era federal grants for clean energy projects in October, it framed the move as an urgent corrective to protect taxpayer funds from waste.

But it wasn’t true.

In little-noticed court documents, federal officials acknowledged this month that they had terminated the funding “based solely” on political criteria, targeting projects in states that were represented by Democrats and had voted for Kamala Harris, the party’s presidential nominee, in the 2024 election.

The admission showed how President Trump has weaponized the provision of federal education, energy, health, housing and infrastructure aid in his second term. Far from rooting out the sort of misspending that Mr. Trump sees as rife in Washington, the White House has instead sought to leverage the budget as a tool to assist its allies — or as a cudgel to hurt the president’s foes.

--

To put this in greater context, President Biden's clean energy projects already favored red states. As a president of all Americans, he was not picking and choosing to favor voters who voted for him.

CF: link

The biggest winners of Biden’s green climate policies? Republicans.

The Inflation Reduction Act, which contained the largest climate investment in US history, would “throw money at woke climate and social programs that won’t work — including over $350 billion for ‘Green New Deal’ initiatives,” Hudson said in a statement after IRA’s passage.

But Hudson – now the head of House Republicans’ campaign committee – is one of the members of Congress whose district has benefitted the most from the climate law and its massive investment in clean energy.

About $12.7 billion in private investment has been announced in Hudson’s district since the bill passed, the second-highest amount in the nation. Much of it is from Toyota expanding a gargantuan car battery plant that has tripled in size since it was first announced. The factory will span the length of 756 football fields and will spur 5,100 new jobs, the company estimates.

More than three quarters of announced clean energy investments are in Republican districts​

The district with the largest total announced investment is Louisiana Democratic Rep. Troy Carter's 2nd district, followed by Republican Rep. Richard Hudson's district in North Carolina, and then five GOP-held districts in Texas, according to an analysis by Rhodium Group and MIT. The top five announced investments are labeled in the map.

--

Meanwhile, of course, this is not the first time Trump has sought to specifically punish blue states.




and what may have been an early iteration of the OP

 

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
30,579
17,375
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟510,061.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Why is it that just because this administration is vindictive, polarizing, unfair, nepotistic, grifting, and manipulating stock markets for their own profit
that people have to point it out?

It doesn't seem fair that the people who vote for him have to read those things.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
30,579
17,375
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟510,061.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Sidenote: I think it is utterly tragic how far behind the US will be in green technology implementation after these yokels. The kind of leadership, the brains, the cash.... Now we have to blast a couple of rich guys to Mars while they tell us to eff the poor.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
49,323
51,625
Los Angeles Area
✟1,148,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
1785180741314.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
5,198
4,380
28
Seattle
✟230,727.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Energy Secretary Chris Wright at a Congressional hearing last month when asked if cancellations were political:

“What you’re referring to is a choice of announcements of some of the awards, not made by our department,” No decisions were made on politics. I keep hearing that charge. It’s (B- you know what). We’re going to say it a million times.”

Apparently it was not "B-you know what".
I don't know if that is perjury, because the GOP congress quite often don't have Trump officials testify under oath. For obvious reasons.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
49,323
51,625
Los Angeles Area
✟1,148,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Perhaps this acts as an admission that the decision was made by the White House.

Per the legal document, the department outlined a list of hundreds of grants in both red and blue states for possible termination, but (with apparently one exception) all of the grants chosen for termination (by whom?) were in blue states.
 
Upvote 0

Goonie

Not so Mystic Mog.
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
10,560
10,141
49
UK
✟1,461,943.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Stolen from Daisy Day, as I think this is the bigger story from her post.

NYT: Trump Administration Admits Canceling Grants to States That Did Not Vote for Him


Federal officials said in court documents that they halted billions of dollars in funding for energy projects to states “based solely” on whether they backed President Trump in the 2024 election.

When the Trump administration canceled more than $7.5 billion in Biden-era federal grants for clean energy projects in October, it framed the move as an urgent corrective to protect taxpayer funds from waste.

But it wasn’t true.

In little-noticed court documents, federal officials acknowledged this month that they had terminated the funding “based solely” on political criteria, targeting projects in states that were represented by Democrats and had voted for Kamala Harris, the party’s presidential nominee, in the 2024 election.

The admission showed how President Trump has weaponized the provision of federal education, energy, health, housing and infrastructure aid in his second term. Far from rooting out the sort of misspending that Mr. Trump sees as rife in Washington, the White House has instead sought to leverage the budget as a tool to assist its allies — or as a cudgel to hurt the president’s foes.

--

To put this in greater context, President Biden's clean energy projects already favored red states. As a president of all Americans, he was not picking and choosing to favor voters who voted for him.

CF: link

The biggest winners of Biden’s green climate policies? Republicans.

The Inflation Reduction Act, which contained the largest climate investment in US history, would “throw money at woke climate and social programs that won’t work — including over $350 billion for ‘Green New Deal’ initiatives,” Hudson said in a statement after IRA’s passage.

But Hudson – now the head of House Republicans’ campaign committee – is one of the members of Congress whose district has benefitted the most from the climate law and its massive investment in clean energy.

About $12.7 billion in private investment has been announced in Hudson’s district since the bill passed, the second-highest amount in the nation. Much of it is from Toyota expanding a gargantuan car battery plant that has tripled in size since it was first announced. The factory will span the length of 756 football fields and will spur 5,100 new jobs, the company estimates.

More than three quarters of announced clean energy investments are in Republican districts​

The district with the largest total announced investment is Louisiana Democratic Rep. Troy Carter's 2nd district, followed by Republican Rep. Richard Hudson's district in North Carolina, and then five GOP-held districts in Texas, according to an analysis by Rhodium Group and MIT. The top five announced investments are labeled in the map.

--

Meanwhile, of course, this is not the first time Trump has sought to specifically punish blue states.




and what may have been an early iteration of the OP

Are you surprised? This a govt representing solely MAGA, all other citizens will not be represented. You will be taxed without representation it is the heart of the new America.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,693
15,599
Earth
✟311,835.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Are you surprised? This a govt representing solely MAGA, all other citizens will not be represented. You will be taxed without representation it is the heart of the new America.
The 43.31% of New Yorkers who voted for Trump must be ecstatic that the 55.91% of their fellow New Yorkers (who voted for the funny-laugh-lady), are having to suffer too!
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
49,323
51,625
Los Angeles Area
✟1,148,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Are you surprised? This a govt representing solely MAGA, all other citizens will not be represented. You will be taxed without representation it is the heart of the new America.
I suppose I'm no longer surprised, but it is nevertheless a shocking abuse of We The People's money.

When cooler heads prevail, I hope these abuses will be addressed and redressed. Hopefully without introducing an equal and opposite corruption. But hey, they wanted a powerful executive unfettered by courts or Congress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
24,213
20,020
✟1,643,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
When cooler heads prevail
Long years of stability has lulled us into thinking that’s a default we will revert back to. There’s no law of the universe that says a return to what was normality is inevitable, things may well get even worse.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
44,617
21,671
Finger Lakes
✟384,262.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Long years of stability has lulled us into thinking that’s a default we will revert back to. There’s no law of the universe that says a return to what was normality is inevitable, things may well get even worse.
My hope is that there will be a hard swing of the pendulum back to democracy, the rule of law and anti-corruption, with strong constraints on the Executive Branch.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
49,323
51,625
Los Angeles Area
✟1,148,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Trump administration targeted California and other blue states for clean energy cuts

  • Hundreds of clean energy projects are in limbo after court filings revealed that when the Trump administration canceled $7.6 billion in clean energy grants last year, it was based solely on states’ political identity, a move legal scholars call unprecedented and potentially unconstitutional discrimination against voters in states that opposed Trump.
  • California stands to lose funding for an estimated 79 projects, including $1.2 billion for its ARCHES hydrogen hub, as lawsuits and federal investigations seek to restore money and safeguard climate innovation.
Large companies, startups, utilities, universities and other nonprofits were among those that lost out on $7.6 billion in clean energy funding terminated by the White House in October. They include the University of California, the California Energy Commission, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and California’s nascent hydrogen hub, the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems, or ARCHES.

At the time, Trump administration officials said the grants were terminated because they “did not adequately advance the nation’s energy needs, were not economically viable, and would not provide a positive return on investment of taxpayer dollars.”

But in court documents filed as part of a lawsuit challenging the cuts, the Department of Energy states the selection of grants was “based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient’s state, i.e., whether the recipient’s location and/or place of performance was in a Blue State or a non-Blue State.”

More projects were cut in California than any other state, about 79 out of nearly 300. They were all for clean energy, many to address climate change, and include investments in new battery plants, upgrades for the electrical grid and initiatives to take carbon out of the air.

The lawsuit alleges that the government’s actions violate the Constitution’s equal protection clause, which prevents arbitrary discrimination, as well as the 1st Amendment in that it is targeting researchers for how their state voted.

[Initiating counsel:] “If they want to favor oil, coal and nuclear, and disfavor clean energy innovation, that’s their prerogative as the executive. But ... None of it was about a change in priorities,” Polsky said, noting that similar grants in red states were not canceled. “None of it was about fiscal stringency. None of it was about anything except punishing people who didn’t vote for Trump.”
 
Upvote 0