- Jun 14, 2004
- 4,244
- 2,175
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Based on historical administration patterns, I doubt they care if it gets dismissed. Time and time again we've seen them make claims and arrest or sue people to use the publicity as both a way to increase outrage among their base and also to deter people from lawfully doing things that might reflect poorly on the administration. The large number of dismissals that follow don't ger the same hyped up media attention and are generally ignored by the sources that the administration's supporter almost exclusively consume. This case may get dismissed, but the base will not be aware and will insist the pool was vandalized.Fixing the pool now may torpedo the vandalism cases if evidence gets spoliated.
A judge warns that a Trump DOJ plan to fix the Reflecting Pool could undermine its own prosecution in Washington, D.C., turning a repair job on the National Mall into a legal conflict over the Reflecting Pool repair effort. The warning matters because prosecutors may need the damaged site as evidence, not just scenery.The core issue is prejudice: if federal agencies alter or repair the pool before defendants can examine alleged damage, defense lawyers could argue the government changed key evidence while still seeking punishment. That is how a Trump DOJ Reflecting Pool fix meant to restore a landmark could complicate, or even weaken, the prosecution.
Upvote
0