WATER BAPTISM DOESN'T WASH AWAY OUR SINS

Dan Perez said:

AND YOU ARE IMBEDED IN WATER BAPTISM and you just one of many !!

Click to expand...

I am not "imbedded" in water baptism. I believe in baptism by immersion in water for those who have been saved.

Dan Perez said:

And when you READ. Acts 19:6. and just say yes OR no , just asking ??

dan p

Click to expand...

Acts 19:6 says:

(Act 19:6 NKJV) And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.

What are you asking me to say yes or no to? You didn't ask a question, and there is no question in Acts 19:6.

prodromos said:

Of course this doesn't apply to you, only the people who disagree with Pope Dan.

Click to expand...

And PETER. WAS TALKING abouT JEWISH BELIEVERS as there is no. GREEK WORD for POPE and ALWAYS USE. the Greek TEXT

WHEN writing. anything. and anyone can check if I have ADDED or SUBTRACTED any words from. the TEXT. !!

OK with you and ALL. should do. the SAME. !!

dan p

David Lamb said:

I am not "imbedded" in water baptism. I believe in baptism by immersion in water for those who have been saved.

Acts 19:6 says:

(Act 19:6 NKJV) And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.

What are you asking me to say yes or no to? You didn't ask a question, and there is no question in Acts 19:6.

Click to expand...

And yon read is all wanted to know and did not reply. where PAUL. laid hands on. them. and they

RECIEVED HOLY SPIRIT. .and will not brother. you. and do liken you !!

dan p

Dan Perez said:

And yon read is all wanted to know and did not reply. where PAUL. laid hands on. them. and they

RECIEVED HOLY SPIRIT. .and will not brother. you. and do liken you !!

dan p

Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean by, "and will not brother. you. and do liken you !!" I would say that the Holy Spirit did not travel through Paul's hands and into the person on whom those hands were laid. In other words, the hand-laying was not the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Jesus told the first disciples:

(Act 1:5 NKJV) for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now."

When that came to pass, no hands were laid on them. Later we read of some Gentiles:

(Act 10:44-47 NKJV) While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God. Then Peter answered, "Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?"

Again, no laying on of hands.

Yes, sometimes the baptism of the Holy Spirit was accompanied by the laying on of hands, but not always, so the laying on of hands cannot itself be the baptism of the Holy Spirit.

David Lamb said:

I am not "imbedded" in water baptism. I believe in baptism by immersion in water for those who have been saved.

Acts 19:6 says:

(Act 19:6 NKJV) And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.

What are you asking me to say yes or no to? You didn't ask a question, and there is no question in Acts 19:6.

Click to expand...

And Eph 4:5 says :

ONE LORD , ONE FAITH , ONE. BAPTISM

And ONE in the Greek is HEIS !!

#1. THERE is BAPTO

# 2 THERE IS BAPTIZO

# 3 THERE SI BAPTIZED

#4 THERE IS SPRINKING

#5. THERE IS BAPTIAMA

#6 THERE is BAPTIZING

#7B SO which is th ONE BAPTISM ??

dan p

Dan Perez said:

And Eph 4:5 says :

ONE LORD , ONE FAITH , ONE. BAPTISM

And ONE in the Greek is HEIS !!

#1. THERE is BAPTO

# 2 THERE IS BAPTIZO

# 3 THERE SI BAPTIZED

#4 THERE IS SPRINKING

#5. THERE IS BAPTIAMA

#6 THERE is BAPTIZING

#7B SO which is th ONE BAPTISM ??

dan p

Click to expand...

I find disconcerting, and difficult to follow the way you answer a post about one Bible passage, in this case, Acts 19:6, with a reply that is entirely about another Bible passage (Ephesians 4:5). Of course it is fine to refer to other passages in the course of a reply, but to answer a post about Acts 19:6 without even mentioning that verse seems strange.