• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Anyone have good arguments against Calvinism.

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,765
6,822
New Jersey
✟454,156.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I am reformed, but not a Calvinist

Can you clarify this for me? When I say "Reformed", I mean belonging to the branch of the Reformation that descended from Calvin's work. Is that how you're using the word, or do you mean something else (e.g., "Protestant" more broadly)?
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,633
7,496
On the bus to Heaven
✟349,449.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Can you clarify this for me? When I say "Reformed", I mean belonging to the branch of the Reformation that descended from Calvin's work. Is that how you're using the word, or do you mean something else (e.g., "Protestant" more broadly)?
I use “reformed” because I agree much more with reformed theology than with any other but I believe that there is not enough information in scripture to conclusively prove TULIP to the exclusion of everything else. For example, I fully reject synergism as it logically flirts with open theism and I embrace monergism but have problems with Calvin’s interpretation and explanation of unconditional election and limited atonement.

BTW- there are no “Protestants” left since there is nothing to protest. Today anyone can choose what Christian church they want to attend. ;)
 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,742
2,719
✟1,173,997.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I use “reformed” because I agree much more with reformed theology than with any other but I believe that there is not enough information in scripture to conclusively prove TULIP to the exclusion of everything else. For example, I fully reject synergism as it logically flirts with open theism and I embrace monergism but have problems with Calvin’s interpretation and explanation of unconditional election and limited atonement.

BTW- there are no “Protestants” left since there is nothing to protest. Today anyone can choose what Christian church they want to attend. ;)
I thought you held limited atonement. Actually, Calvin never taught limited atonement. That has of course been debated.

My biggest problem with Calvinism is limited atonement. I don't think the other points are correct either, but they are of less concern to me.

I'll get back to you on your other post.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,633
7,496
On the bus to Heaven
✟349,449.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I thought you held limited atonement. Actually, Calvin never taught limited atonement. That has of course been debated.
He did but at the end it depends on who you ask. Some even accuse him of teaching universalism.
 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,742
2,719
✟1,173,997.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In the same way as he loves his creation. I described that in a very short version. Apparently there is something real to the restoring of creation to himself. It is within his glorifying himself, as described in Romans 9:22, 23. You want him to equally intend mercy toward all. But it doesn't say that.
God desires to save everyone (1 Tim 2:3-4). That's what it means when it says He loved the world in such a way He sent His Son.
Two things, here: 1) If it is his saving love toward all sinners, (which it doesn't say specifically—2) thus, you too are going beyond what it does say to claim it is referring to his saving love toward all sinners. That's nice, but it is not what it says. It is derived OF your theology instead of it driving your theology.)
Can you show how it is derived of my theology? I think it's derived from the context.

Is it derived of Piper's, MacArthur's and D.A. Carson's theology too? Let's see what they say:

"But on the other hand, John 3:16 says, “God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.” This surely means that God is loving all and offering all eternal life — the very life that the Spirit gives in verse 8"


"Here is a profound wonder: God loved "the world"—this wicked realm of fallen humanity—so much that He sacrificed His only begotten Son to pay the price of redemption for all who believe in Him"


"God’s love as depicted in 3:16 is in line with His call to all sinners to turn from the broad way that leads to death onto the narrow road that leads to life, Carson said. The verse makes clear that the Gospel is to be preached to all persons, but it spotlights the fact that God loves them despite their sinfulness and rebellion, he said."

I'm sure they don't agree with my full understanding of John 3:16-17, but they seem to agree the world refers to all mankind and not creation.

A sidenote: I'm aware that it's Jeff Robinson quoting D.A. Carson.

1) (cont'd): If, I say, it is his saving love toward all sinners, then you need to explain how, if [spontaneous] freewill reigns, [uncaused to choose one way or the other], some choose Christ and some don't; some believe and some don't. You can't get something from nothing. The whole semantic range of reasons is missing. Granted, though, I still don't know if you only mean "real" instead of quite, "free".
Your Biblical understanding seems to be strongly influenced by your philosophy on the will. It's not of a concern to me how it works. My concern is what the Bible teaches.

In what way God loves all sinners? He wants what's best for everyone, and desires everyone's salvation (again 1 Tim 2:3-4). If we have free libertarian will or not is a separate question and does not change what the Bible says.
I'm not speaking of a general sense in the way you seem to take me, as I thought I made clear before. God is a very specific God. He does not intend the salvation toward all, as you yourself show with verse 14. Yet, you depart from that particularity into a general meaning for "world".
No, I showed that the passage is about salvation, not about God's restoration of the world. When Moses hung up the serpent the intent of "salvation" was universal, it was for all who had been bitten by snakes (compare with the fall and the cross), but only those who actually looked at the serpent were healed (compare with "whoever believes will be saved").
Nope. But nice catch, there.

But there is no contradiction. I don't differentiate as radically between 'world' (humans) and 'world' (creation) as I do between 'world' (creation) and 'world' (restored).
Can you show by the context that John 3:16-17 is about the restoration of the world? If not, I think you should look into other options.
Not quite. You judge "most natural" according to your worldview and assumptions (as, granted, do we all). But 'most natural' is not a good hermeneutic, but only one element within a good hermeneutic. Second, "much more complex", is a view from our present circumstances. To the eternal view, in which what God has completed, Heaven, and "restored creation", as the completion of the course of all created fact, it is not at all complicated.
Granted, the most natural reading is not always the correct one, and we can have different opinions on what is most natural. But most Biblical scholars actually agree with me that the world refers to everyone in the world. There has to be a good reason to understand it differently and so far I have not seen one.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,633
7,496
On the bus to Heaven
✟349,449.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
14,703
6,325
Minnesota
✟399,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Fortunately, for me, I did not need to conflate the statement with the conclusion. Many other folks have done that long before me, including the chaps at the Council of Trent. On a personal level, I grew up as a non-Catholic in a very Catholic city with sincere Catholics who informed me that, indeed, not only has the Catholic Church been endowed with all divinely revealed truth and with all means of grace but, also there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church, ergo I am damned along with each and every non-Catholic who does not repent and embrace the Catholic faith.

Now, however, I can bask in the glory that the Catholic Church (according to some of its members) thinks that salvation is possible for me (if I repent and embrace the Catholic faith).
That's too bad, I grew up in a city which was maybe 30 to 40 percent Catholic, and whether you were a Catholic or Protestant rarely came up in any conversation. As to your experience, unfortunately children are not always kind to other children. Back in 1863 Pope Pius IX covered the subject, including the salvation of sincere non-Catholics which I have highlighted in bold:

7. Here, too, our beloved sons and venerable brothers, it is again necessary to mention and censure a very grave error entrapping some Catholics who believe that it is possible to arrive at eternal salvation although living in error and alienated from the true faith and Catholic unity. Such belief is certainly opposed to Catholic teaching. There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments.
8. Also well known is the Catholic teaching that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church. Eternal salvation cannot be obtained by those who oppose the authority and statements of the same Church and are stubbornly separated from the unity of the Church and also from the successor of Peter, the Roman Pontiff, to whom “the custody of the vineyard has been committed by the Savior.”[4] The words of Christ are clear enough: “If he refuses to listen even to the Church, let him be to you a Gentile and a tax collector;”[5] “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you, rejects me, and he who rejects me, rejects him who sent me;”[6] “He who does not believe will be condemned;”[7] “He who does not believe is already condemned;”[8] “He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.”[9] The Apostle Paul says that such persons are “perverted and self-condemned;”[10] the Prince of the Apostles calls them “false teachers . . . who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master. . . bringing upon themselves swift destruction.”[11]
9. God forbid that the children of the Catholic Church should even in any way be unfriendly to those who are not at all united to us by the same bonds of faith and love. On the contrary, let them be eager always to attend to their needs with all the kind services of Christian charity, whether they are poor or sick or suffering any other kind of visitation. First of all, let them rescue them from the darkness of the errors into which they have unhappily fallen and strive to guide them back to Catholic truth and to their most loving Mother who is ever holding out her maternal arms to receive them lovingly back into her fold. Thus, firmly founded in faith, hope, and charity and fruitful in every good work, they will gain eternal salvation.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,633
7,496
On the bus to Heaven
✟349,449.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That's too bad, I grew up in a city which was maybe 30 to 40 percent Catholic, and whether you were a Catholic or Protestant rarely came up in any conversation. As to your experience, unfortunately children are not always kind to other children. Back in 1863 Pope Pius IX covered the subject, including the salvation of sincere non-Catholics which I have highlighted in bold:

7. Here, too, our beloved sons and venerable brothers, it is again necessary to mention and censure a very grave error entrapping some Catholics who believe that it is possible to arrive at eternal salvation although living in error and alienated from the true faith and Catholic unity. Such belief is certainly opposed to Catholic teaching. There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments.
8. Also well known is the Catholic teaching that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church. Eternal salvation cannot be obtained by those who oppose the authority and statements of the same Church and are stubbornly separated from the unity of the Church and also from the successor of Peter, the Roman Pontiff, to whom “the custody of the vineyard has been committed by the Savior.”[4] The words of Christ are clear enough: “If he refuses to listen even to the Church, let him be to you a Gentile and a tax collector;”[5] “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you, rejects me, and he who rejects me, rejects him who sent me;”[6] “He who does not believe will be condemned;”[7] “He who does not believe is already condemned;”[8] “He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.”[9] The Apostle Paul says that such persons are “perverted and self-condemned;”[10] the Prince of the Apostles calls them “false teachers . . . who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master. . . bringing upon themselves swift destruction.”[11]
9. God forbid that the children of the Catholic Church should even in any way be unfriendly to those who are not at all united to us by the same bonds of faith and love. On the contrary, let them be eager always to attend to their needs with all the kind services of Christian charity, whether they are poor or sick or suffering any other kind of visitation. First of all, let them rescue them from the darkness of the errors into which they have unhappily fallen and strive to guide them back to Catholic truth and to their most loving Mother who is ever holding out her maternal arms to receive them lovingly back into her fold. Thus, firmly founded in faith, hope, and charity and fruitful in every good work, they will gain eternal salvation.
We are not struggling with invincible ignorance about the Catholic Church. I gladly and honestly choose to not be a member of the Catholic Church. How does that affect my salvation?

Secondly, I bolded and increased the font in a section in your post above to illustrate the error in thinking by those during the time of Pope Pius XI (which extends to today given the elitism shown here). We are not in the darkness of “our” errors but in the light of the Catholic Church errors and will not return. These statements are quite pompous even for 1863. I guess the RCC is still sore at the reformation.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
32,057
14,531
74
✟468,904.00
Faith
Non-Denom
That's too bad, I grew up in a city which was maybe 30 to 40 percent Catholic, and whether you were a Catholic or Protestant rarely came up in any conversation. As to your experience, unfortunately children are not always kind to other children. Back in 1863 Pope Pius IX covered the subject, including the salvation of sincere non-Catholics which I have highlighted in bold:

7. Here, too, our beloved sons and venerable brothers, it is again necessary to mention and censure a very grave error entrapping some Catholics who believe that it is possible to arrive at eternal salvation although living in error and alienated from the true faith and Catholic unity. Such belief is certainly opposed to Catholic teaching. There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments.
8. Also well known is the Catholic teaching that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church. Eternal salvation cannot be obtained by those who oppose the authority and statements of the same Church and are stubbornly separated from the unity of the Church and also from the successor of Peter, the Roman Pontiff, to whom “the custody of the vineyard has been committed by the Savior.”[4] The words of Christ are clear enough: “If he refuses to listen even to the Church, let him be to you a Gentile and a tax collector;”[5] “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you, rejects me, and he who rejects me, rejects him who sent me;”[6] “He who does not believe will be condemned;”[7] “He who does not believe is already condemned;”[8] “He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.”[9] The Apostle Paul says that such persons are “perverted and self-condemned;”[10] the Prince of the Apostles calls them “false teachers . . . who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master. . . bringing upon themselves swift destruction.”[11]
9. God forbid that the children of the Catholic Church should even in any way be unfriendly to those who are not at all united to us by the same bonds of faith and love. On the contrary, let them be eager always to attend to their needs with all the kind services of Christian charity, whether they are poor or sick or suffering any other kind of visitation. First of all, let them rescue them from the darkness of the errors into which they have unhappily fallen and strive to guide them back to Catholic truth and to their most loving Mother who is ever holding out her maternal arms to receive them lovingly back into her fold. Thus, firmly founded in faith, hope, and charity and fruitful in every good work, they will gain eternal salvation.
Thank you for the excellent reply. Sadly, it was not just Catholic children who held this opinion, but their parents, as well. They, themselves, did not invent these ideas but received them from religious authorities, and believed them.

The encyclical that you posted made me smile at the doublespeak. In paragraph 7 there is a total denial of the necessity for Jesus Christ and His Church to provide salvation for unbelievers. In this case their salvation is neither monergistic nor synergistic. They will be saved solely and completely based on their ethics and morality. This places the Christian faith at the same level as all other works-based religions.

However, in the very next paragraph this is completely and fully contradicted with the historic assertion that there is no salvation apart from the Catholic Church.

The net result, as our friend Hentenza, has commented in the post prior to this, is that faithful Protestants can never be saved unless they repent and embrace the Catholic faith. However, Hindus and Muslims and Atheists and all manner of unbelievers who violently oppose Christianity, through invincible ignorance, will be saved. My question, then, is how long will these folks be punished in Purgatory?
 
Upvote 0

throughfierytrial

Truth-Lover
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2014
3,085
885
Leesburg
✟745,560.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
Isn’t it correct to say that human reason with faith brings one salvation? This would be a point of contention. The Bible states Apostle Paul reasoned with the philosophers on Mars Hill described in Acts but Paul reasoned from the Scriptures. So goes the dispute I believe. Faith Alone or reason and faith.

I am not too read up on Calvinism… you tell me if I’m incorrect in my information
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
14,703
6,325
Minnesota
✟399,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
We are not struggling with invincible ignorance about the Catholic Church. I gladly and honestly choose to not be a member of the Catholic Church. How does that affect my salvation?

Secondly, I bolded and increased the font in a section in your post above to illustrate the error in thinking by those during the time of Pope Pius XI (which extends to today given the elitism shown here). We are not in the darkness of “our” errors but in the light of the Catholic Church errors and will not return. These statements are quite pompous even for 1863. I guess the RCC is still sore at the reformation.
All religions think they are right. The pope discerned that those who sincerely believe they are right and act piously to follow God will not be rejected by God.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
14,703
6,325
Minnesota
✟399,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Thank you for the excellent reply. Sadly, it was not just Catholic children who held this opinion, but their parents, as well. They, themselves, did not invent these ideas but received them from religious authorities, and believed them.

The encyclical that you posted made me smile at the doublespeak. In paragraph 7 there is a total denial of the necessity for Jesus Christ and His Church to provide salvation for unbelievers. In this case their salvation is neither monergistic nor synergistic. They will be saved solely and completely based on their ethics and morality. This places the Christian faith at the same level as all other works-based religions.

However, in the very next paragraph this is completely and fully contradicted with the historic assertion that there is no salvation apart from the Catholic Church.

The net result, as our friend Hentenza, has commented in the post prior to this, is that faithful Protestants can never be saved unless they repent and embrace the Catholic faith. However, Hindus and Muslims and Atheists and all manner of unbelievers who violently oppose Christianity, through invincible ignorance, will be saved. My question, then, is how long will these folks be punished in Purgatory?
It's not contradicted at all, Catholics consider Protestants as part of the Catholic Church but who lack the fullness of the faith. The purification spoken of in the Bible, and Catholics consider the Bible God-breathed, should not be mocked.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
32,057
14,531
74
✟468,904.00
Faith
Non-Denom
All religions think they are right. The pope discerned that those who sincerely believe they are right and act piously to follow God will not be rejected by God.
Therein lies a conundrum. Pious Muslims believe that they are right and one of their pious acts is to annihilate infidels, which includes Jews and Christians, as well as all other non-Muslims. Thus, the deeply pious Islamic terrorists who launched their attack on September 11, 2001 on the Great Satan, the United States, and became martyrs in the process, may find themselves in Christian heaven, instead of Muslim heaven with the 99 virgins promised to them. Interesting. . .
 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,742
2,719
✟1,173,997.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Thanks, will take a look at it.

Here is another article on Calvin's view on the atonement you might find interesting:

 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,742
2,719
✟1,173,997.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I asked for a quotation where Calvin says the atonement is limited, not a reference to chapters about election. You can teach God chose the elect before time began, and still hold universal atonement as true. No contradiction there, and that's what confessional Lutherans teach.

Please provide the exact passage where Calvin explains Christ’s death was intended only for the elect or that he did not die for the non-elect. If this is what Calvin taught, it shouldn't be too hard to find in my estimation.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
25,549
5,663
47
Oregon
✟1,215,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
The people who will be saved will always be those that were chosen to be saved by God from before the beginnings of this world, or this reality, and possibly this universe, etc. Consequently, those who aren't, won't ever be, because they never were, etc.

The precise basis for this choosing/not choosing no one knows in every individual case, but a lot of people are going to be very shocked at the judgement I think, etc. Or at least, they will be at the start, because the only reason and purpose for even having a judgement, is just to show those whom God chose and didn't choose, and why, etc. This will be to silence everyone and so it can't be questioned again after that, etc, because it will be shown out to be, the only truly just judgement, etc.

Don't believe those who say they know for sure whom God has (already) chosen, or not chosen for every individual case, cause they're not only going to shown out to be wrong in a lot of cases (more than likely) (unless they get lucky by the luck of a draw in a few cases, etc) but they are arrogant, haughty, self-assuming liars, etc. All of those individual cases can only be fully known at the judgement, etc. Because that will be the one and only thing it's even for, etc. God already knows it's not at all clear to us yet right now (for the honest souls out there anyway) which is why it will all need to be made clear at the judgement.

God Bless.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: zoidar
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,742
2,719
✟1,173,997.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If the person has the Spirit then they have been regenerated unless you are suggesting that the unregenerated have the Spirit.
Agree, if a person has the Spirit, the person has been regenerated. My view is however, as I have said, we repent, turn to God and He regenerates us - we receive the Holy Spirit.
Correct. The action begins with God not with man.
Yes, but man needs to respond when God calls. It's not so that man necessarily comes when called.
“There is no one who understands, There is no one who seeks out God;”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭3‬:‭11‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

So if there is no one that seeks God then how does the unregenerated seek God?
You are making a conclusion from this verse, I don't make. I think it's the general description of man after the fall. He does not seek God on his own, but still needs to respond when God calls. I don't see a description here of man not being able to respond without being regenerated, but rather that man doesn't seek God on his own.

Why does the unregenerate man seek God? Because he is called by the Spirit. He has however not received the Spirit yet, to be regenerated.

The regenerared man does not need to seek God, he already knows God.
Interesting because we are saying the same thing. God’s grace does indeed enables people to respond to the gospel but God’s grace is a gift from God given by only God so the natural man cannot get grace apart from God. This is the basis on monetarism. No one can repent and believe without God’s gift of grace.
But grace can be resisted. So even we don't respond without God's grace, given grace doesn't necessarily mean a person comes.
I’m not adding a step to John 3:16 but merely stating the obvious. Belief always starts with God’s grace.
I don't see what that has to do with the extent of the atonement.
Yep. And, as you stated above, God’s grace is what enables people to respond to the gospel then the opposite is equally true. No God’s grace equals no response to the gospel. God does indeed loves the world but not all of the world will have faith. If not all of the world will have faith then there are some to which God will not give His free gift of grace.
I cannot tell if everyone has been given enough grace to respond and come to faith or not. But as already stated, given grace doesn't nessesarily mean you respond by coming. Grace can be resisted.

When you talk about the free gift of grace it sounds more like the grace we are given after we have accepted the gospel and repented, whereafter God regenerates us/bestows us the Holy Spirit. That is truly the free gift of grace. Another word for it is salvation.
“What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is there? Far from it! For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whomever I have mercy, and I will show compassion to whomever I show compassion.” So then, it does not depend on the person who wants it nor the one who runs, but on God who has mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very reason I raised you up, in order to demonstrate My power in you, and that My name might be proclaimed throughout the earth.” So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭9‬:‭14‬-‭18‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

I know.

Thanks.

Great.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
14,703
6,325
Minnesota
✟399,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Therein lies a conundrum. Pious Muslims believe that they are right and one of their pious acts is to annihilate infidels, which includes Jews and Christians, as well as all other non-Muslims. Thus, the deeply pious Islamic terrorists who launched their attack on September 11, 2001 on the Great Satan, the United States, and became martyrs in the process, may find themselves in Christian heaven, instead of Muslim heaven with the 99 virgins promised to them. Interesting. . .
Not a conundrum for God. God has made an imprint on every human being, imparting a sense of right and wrong, and the Holy Spirit calls to everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zoidar
Upvote 0