- Mar 18, 2004
- 72,206
- 8,635
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
This is more of a question than a hermeneutics discussion, and so might not be appropriate in this forum but I couldn’t find a better place for it.
I am just a layperson trying to do some scripture studying and occasional debate, and have relied for many years on sites like The Blue Letter Bible to understand the various translations and interpretations, but lately I have wanted to dive a little deeper into the manuscripts, themselves (key word being little), but I find it is drawing me in deeper that I wanted to go. LOL.
I know that the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has added quite a bit to the discussion of whether closer to the original manuscripts is better or not (I am not really interested in this question, though), but I watched a video that discussed that the DSS were DNA tested with results that were not expected and wanted to see how that impacts the overall thought processes of those scrolls, in general.
I am just a layperson trying to do some scripture studying and occasional debate, and have relied for many years on sites like The Blue Letter Bible to understand the various translations and interpretations, but lately I have wanted to dive a little deeper into the manuscripts, themselves (key word being little), but I find it is drawing me in deeper that I wanted to go. LOL.
I know that the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has added quite a bit to the discussion of whether closer to the original manuscripts is better or not (I am not really interested in this question, though), but I watched a video that discussed that the DSS were DNA tested with results that were not expected and wanted to see how that impacts the overall thought processes of those scrolls, in general.