• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Historical Manuscripts and Especially The Dead Sea Scrolls

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
72,206
8,635
Western New York
✟270,648.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is more of a question than a hermeneutics discussion, and so might not be appropriate in this forum but I couldn’t find a better place for it.

I am just a layperson trying to do some scripture studying and occasional debate, and have relied for many years on sites like The Blue Letter Bible to understand the various translations and interpretations, but lately I have wanted to dive a little deeper into the manuscripts, themselves (key word being little), but I find it is drawing me in deeper that I wanted to go. LOL.

I know that the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has added quite a bit to the discussion of whether closer to the original manuscripts is better or not (I am not really interested in this question, though), but I watched a video that discussed that the DSS were DNA tested with results that were not expected and wanted to see how that impacts the overall thought processes of those scrolls, in general.
 

Reluctant Theologian

אַבְרָהָם
Jul 13, 2021
910
675
QLD
✟175,065.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This is more of a question than a hermeneutics discussion, and so might not be appropriate in this forum but I couldn’t find a better place for it.

I am just a layperson trying to do some scripture studying and occasional debate, and have relied for many years on sites like The Blue Letter Bible to understand the various translations and interpretations, but lately I have wanted to dive a little deeper into the manuscripts, themselves (key word being little), but I find it is drawing me in deeper that I wanted to go. LOL.

I know that the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has added quite a bit to the discussion of whether closer to the original manuscripts is better or not (I am not really interested in this question, though), but I watched a video that discussed that the DSS were DNA tested with results that were not expected and wanted to see how that impacts the overall thought processes of those scrolls, in general.
The science of textual criticism and archaeology/discovery of new manuscripts is of great importance in improving the accuracy of the reconstruction of the most likely manuscript originals and/or, because manuscripts may have a history (copying/editing), reconstruct the textual historical development over time. And in that context, yes the Dead Sea Scrolls are very important - provide info on what (version of) manuscripts were known/available at that time, etc.

E.g. one of the interesting findings of the DSS are LXX fragments where they kept the name of God as the original Hebrew Tetragrammaton, instead of the usual 'kyrios' in the standard Greek - apparently the Essene community felt the name of God can or should not be translated as such.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
72,206
8,635
Western New York
✟270,648.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The science of textual criticism and archaeology/discovery of new manuscripts is of great importance in improving the accuracy of the reconstruction of the most likely manuscript originals and/or, because manuscripts may have a history (copying/editing), reconstruct the textual historical development over time. And in that context, yes the Dead Sea Scrolls are very important - provide info on what (version of) manuscripts were known/available at that time, etc.

E.g. one of the interesting findings of the DSS are LXX fragments where they kept the name of God as the original Hebrew Tetragrammaton, instead of the usual 'kyrios' in the standard Greek - apparently the Essene community felt the name of God can or should not be translated as such.
The video I watched suggested that because the name of God is revered above all else, that anything with the name of God in/on it could not be destroyed so they left the worn-out scrolls in the caves as a depository, so that they did not have to be destroyed.

I have not really gotten far into my home study on the manuscripts, so I am not familiar with when the LXX was first introduced. I kind of thought it was later on because isn’t it what the early church use for a while for the OT?
 
Upvote 0

Reluctant Theologian

אַבְרָהָם
Jul 13, 2021
910
675
QLD
✟175,065.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The video I watched suggested that because the name of God is revered above all else, that anything with the name of God in/on it could not be destroyed so they left the worn-out scrolls in the caves as a depository, so that they did not have to be destroyed.

I have not really gotten far into my home study on the manuscripts, so I am not familiar with when the LXX was first introduced. I kind of thought it was later on because isn’t it what the early church use for a while for the OT?
The LXX/Septuagint Greek translation of the TNK/OT was created around 250 BC in Alexandria in Egypt by the Jewish community there. It was already well-known and established at the time the Essene community was formed. And indeed (Hellenist) Jews and believers throughout the Roman Empire used that translation widely. About 50% of the NT citations of the TNK/OT are from the LXX - that's an important marker.

The LXX Greek text for the TNK/OT does differ slightly from the best Hebrew reconstructed text now. So maybe the jury is still out as to what is closest to the original Hebrew.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

NewLifeInChristJesus

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2011
1,870
531
Georgia
✟140,366.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
This is more of a question than a hermeneutics discussion, and so might not be appropriate in this forum but I couldn’t find a better place for it.

I am just a layperson trying to do some scripture studying and occasional debate, and have relied for many years on sites like The Blue Letter Bible to understand the various translations and interpretations, but lately I have wanted to dive a little deeper into the manuscripts, themselves (key word being little), but I find it is drawing me in deeper that I wanted to go. LOL.

I know that the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has added quite a bit to the discussion of whether closer to the original manuscripts is better or not (I am not really interested in this question, though), but I watched a video that discussed that the DSS were DNA tested with results that were not expected and wanted to see how that impacts the overall thought processes of those scrolls, in general.
Here is a good overview: Dead Sea Scrolls - Wikipedia.
 
Upvote 0