Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org
Nice thread.What is the Minnesota Truth Council? - The Advocates for Human Rights
This reminds me of the "Ministry of Truth" idea with that Mary Poppins woman during the Biden administration. I wonder how non-partisan it actually is and if this non-profit will obtain some taxpayer dollars through grants, etc.
What is the Minnesota Truth Council? - The Advocates for Human Rights
This reminds me of the "Ministry of Truth" idea with that Mary Poppins woman during the Biden administration. I wonder how non-partisan it actually is and if this non-profit will obtain some taxpayer dollars through grants, etc.
Mary Poppins is a fictional character and the movie about her came out when Joe Biden was in college.What is the Minnesota Truth Council? - The Advocates for Human Rights
This reminds me of the "Ministry of Truth" idea with that Mary Poppins woman during the Biden administration. I wonder how non-partisan it actually is and if this non-profit will obtain some taxpayer dollars through grants, etc.
We had real time video on bodycams so we could see much of the protesting/rioting. But there will still be some who weren't on camera I guess.
Found it:
A search link? Seriously? Do you think we are dumb enough to click on a search link with embedded tracking?Found it:
nina jankowicz singing - Search Videos
Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.www.bing.com
So you’re the guy that uses Bing!Found it:
nina jankowicz singing - Search Videos
Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.
And just because it may be on bodycam, doesn't mean that the footage will be shared with local authorities, let alone the public.
You mean Nina Jankowicz. She's very interesting . She discusses the disinformation on both sides of media, politics and online bullying. Yes, it's sad , that the News media lies. The Minnesota Truth Council will be about the. Truth and the harassment the ICE and Trump administration has caused. I hope the harassment is told. We've had ICE for a long time. And there was no reasons for the evil tactics, that Trump wanted.What is the Minnesota Truth Council? - The Advocates for Human Rights
This reminds me of the "Ministry of Truth" idea with that Mary Poppins woman during the Biden administration. I wonder how non-partisan it actually is and if this non-profit will obtain some taxpayer dollars through grants, etc.
Calling it "non-partisan" is a bit of a stretch (in terms of what most people consider that term to mean)
Perhaps they should learn what the term actually means. Perhaps we should start ...
...here: "non-partisan" is not the same as "bi-partisan". Bi-partisan is explicitly political and dedicated to the notion that all that exists is D v. R
Calling something "non-partisan" is often used to convey the notion that it's an even split between both teams, and the findings/conclusions are part of a true bipartisan consensus.
None of those positions is explicitly linked to either major party.
That would be within the definition of "non-partisan", but more importantly, the placing of these peoples was not done based on their political alignement. They are not partisan politicians.
Trump's cabinet could at best be called "bipartisan" with a couple "democrats" joining persons who are explicitly partisan republicans, but more importantly they are all partisan Trumpists.
Calling it "non-partisan" is a bit of a stretch (in terms of what most people consider that term to mean)
Calling something "non-partisan" is often used to convey the notion that it's an even split between both teams, and the findings/conclusions are part of a true bipartisan consensus.
Their non-partisan committee consists of
Chair - the judge who presided over the Derek Chauvin trial
Vice Chair - an executive from the HRC
An immigration lawyer
Two Immigration Studies professors from the University of Minnesota
A sociology professor from U of M
The chair of the American-Somali Leadership committee
Two union leaders
An ACLU leader for Minnesota
...and one token retired Police Chief from the suburbs. (and before anyone gets bent out of shape, I don't mean token as in "he's black", I mean token in terms of "see, we have a law enforcement guy on the committee")
While it may be "non-partisan" strictly in a semantic sense that the ACLU person may identify as a Libertarian, and 1 or 2 of them may identify as "independent". It's stacked in favor of the left-leaning viewpoints on the subject.
By that standard, Trump's cabinet was "non-partisan", in that RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard were democrats/independents, so that means it's a well balanced entity, right??
This committee is basically tailored to producing the "expert" conclusion of "Conservative actions on immigration = bad"
Correct, but as noted, they're playing to the fact that many members of the general public often use them interchangeably or operate on the assumption that one means the other (incorrectly)
Right, but most of those of those are heavily tilted toward one specific viewpoint on the subject (and that viewpoint happens to be the one held by the left)
Governor Walz stated: “Minnesotans demand and deserve a public record that reflects the violent, cruel, inhumane, and deeply disturbing actions of federal immigration agents.”
why should we bow to a common error? I wasn't addressing those in the general public who don't know the difference. I was addressing *you* and *your post* where *you* used it incorrectly. (And seemingly knew the difference ahead of time.)
Are you trying to "both sides" the terrorizing of the Minnesota populace by Trump's deportation army?
It's not bowing to the common error, it's recognizing that capitalizing on contemporary usage is shameless exploiting that common error.
No, I'm saying that the committee itself is largely theater and a waste of time and money, and will just be another "expert panel" for people to appeal to for the thing they already believe.
Learn how words work. That is my advice to you and all of those you are accepting in their error.
Confusing non-partisan with bi-partisan is like confusing non-metallic with bi-metallic. (or is it "partisan" that you have problems comprehending?)
Oh, we could tell. Just come out and say it instead of playing word games.
Not in public political discourse.
